do you think that military action is needed agaist iran to stop their production of nuke's ?????

Answer 1

Unfortunately, a nuclear armed hell hole like Iran with it's radical Shiite government headed by a nut case of a dictator cannot be allowed to exist. In the past, negotiations and diplomacy have failed miserably when trying to deal with Iran - and that's not a very good omen.
If all else fails, I see no other alternative. I would, however, absolutely not put any American troops in that country - simply hammer all of their nuclear facilities and other arsenals with heavy, repeated and sustained bombing. I suspect they would be ready to negotiate shortly after they lose all of their military capabilities.

Answer 2

No.

Suppose the the Iranians are so thoroughly nuts as to use nukes the second they had them, despite the fact they would guarantee the demise of their own regime, the deaths of untold numbers of their countrymen, the loss, perhaps permanently of whatever prosperity they have.

If that's the case, why haven't they already distributed radioactive waste to terrorist operatives all over the world? They have research reactors, they've been dealing with radioactive material for years.

If all the Iranians dream about is throwing away their whole country for a pointless gesture, there should have been dirty bombs going off all over the place long before now.

No. It's hysteria. Sheer paranoia, produced by people utterly warlike in demeanor, who quite often won't serve in the wars they insist on starting.

Answer 3

NO.
In the first place, according to the international agencies watching Iran, they don't have nuclear weapons, won't for several years--and it's not even certain that they are even trying to build a neuclear device. Even if they did, it would take still more years before they'd have a deliverable device.

Now of course, Bush says otherwise. After his sterling performance with Iraq, do you think anyone with the sense God promised a goat is going to take HIS word over the judgement of the international experts?

Answer 4

That would depend on quickly we can get the draft up and going because that can of worms will not stop at Iran's borders.

Answer 5

And do we have PROOF that Iran is manufacturing nuclear weapons?

Oh, THAT'S RIGHT: We have to **** things up even worse by doing another "pre-emptive strike" against Iran--or get Israel to do the dirty work for us.

Except, they have their hands full dealing with the Palestinians, the fallout from their failed war in Lebanon, and a few other things.

When will we EVER learn from past mistakes?

Answer 6

Wasnt this an identical tale that become promoted before we went into Iraq?  Iran has each reason to construct nuclear guns as a conflict deterrent. Iraq to the west, Afghanistan to the east, both were invaded.  In 2004, Libya gave up their guns application. look what happened to them. considering that North Korea obtained nuclear guns, the US hasn't theory two times about stepping foot into their us of a. And why might want to we, they do no longer have oil. notwithstanding, Israel's no longer-so-secret nuclear arsenal is against the law.  also, the US is the only us of a contained in the international to have ever used an atomic weapon. How any of those international places have the nerve to guage all and sundry in any respect is previous me. Does Iran no longer have a reason to be mad at us in any case? properly, we did overthrow their democratically elected accurate Minister and installation the Shah for our personal own benefit. And at the same time as become the most suitable time Iran invaded a rustic, or no longer to indicate led to damage to all and sundry? The Iran-Iraq conflict? at the same time as Iraq become sponsored and armed with the help of the US and Iran defended themselves? The media has the american public with the help of the balls as evidenced with the help of the actual shown reality that uneducated morons on Yahoo solutions save repeating that Ahmadinejad threatened to wipe Israel off the map, which he by no potential did.  If the mullahs needed Israel lengthy gone, have self assurance you me, it would want to were executed already. Israel is smaller than New Jersey; one offered nuke (from surely one of Iran's many nuclear allies) might want to neutralize the area. human beings might want to no longer care the position their tax money is going. 

Answer 7

Not until 20 other countries have said it is necessary. I am not going to believe George -the boy who cried wolf- Bush and his faulty or cherry picked intelligence.

Answer 8

Yup...either that or we can listen to their story about nukes being for energy purposes when they sit on tons of oil and discover we're too late.

Answer 9

Yes. All talking does is generate greenhouse gases.

Answer 10

yes, they are beyond diplomacy. the nuclear facilities should be blown to kingdom come.