LIBERAL DEMOCRATS: Why Do They Want Us To Intervene in Sudan's Civil War?

Question

Why do Libs and the world sit back waiting for the U.S. to take action? Do Libs think they can pick the battles that the U.S. .should fight when the Libs only represent 7% of the military?

Isn't the entire continent of Africa a toilet run by corrupt leaders who haven't been able to lead since the English de-colonized these hell holes?

Answer 1

Well, as soon as we invaded, people would say the the US government was stealing something from there, too.
Like the oil from Iraq thing, there would be another conspiracy theory about stealing sand or something.
I bet if we invaded England, they would say we were stealing tea and crumpets.
Anyway, as much as I would like to see the genocide in Sudan stop, I don't think it can be done without destroying the Sudanese government. It would just be another Iraq, and insurgency would spring up there, too. One war at a time, please.
Although I haven't heard anyone suggest invading, if they did, It does seem kind of retarded that they would protest the war in Iraq then insist upon invading Sudan, doesn't it?
And after we invaded, like how they originally voted to invade Iraq, they would flip-flop and protest that too, mostly out of bordom, which is the primary reason they protest anything.
Then there'll be the "America is policing the world" complaint. It's more like babysitting the world, really.

Answer 2

Yes Gorgeous the people are really that ignorant. Two minutes of research and they would know about the oil in the Sudan, but it sounds better to make false claims and accusations.


The libs think that ONLY they can make good decisions. The UN, a savior to the libs, is already there so why don't they do something about the situation in Darfur?

Answer 3

They don't understand (I'm a democrat, but not liberal).
They want to do good regardless of the law.
They want who they don't like to be fired regardless of the law.
They want whomever they want to enter the country regardless of the law.
It's wrong.

They would invade sovereign nations without the same nation doing anything to lose that sovereignity. We invaded Iraq and Afghanistan because they attacked us and/or our allies.

Former President Bush invaded because it was his goal to intervene in another countries policies or actions (right or wrong). Present Democrats want the same thing.

What is interesting is how often it is to protect the Islamic population that Liberal Democrats act.

My family escaped Islam in the 1950s. We've been expecting this war for several decades. We're not surprised that people are supporting this. Islam has been preparing for this for two centuries. President Bush caught them before they were ready.

Answer 4

So what you are saying is the United States military is mostly a tool to further Republican interests? Are they just the GOP Army and not the US Army?

Why do Republicans argue that the war is brining hope to the Iraqis, but think that the people of Darfur deserve nothing? Because they are Africans? Oh, right, you already said they live in hell-holes. Very telling.

And for what it's worth, I don't believe in any intervention.

edit-I just had to say that michelob86's answer is terrific.

Answer 5

this a perfect intervention for the UN.
notice they never condemn dictators .
where the UN ,anybody .except USA.
USA goes in ,only when no one else will. .those days are gone.
while the UN talks people die.
which was more of a treath to the world sadam or dafur?

Answer 6

Are you trying to say that rape, slavery and genocide are the exclusive concerns of "liberal" Democrats? Obviously you are a member of the cult of loonies and goonies that infest th Republican party. Stick to your principles!! The earth is flat and Bushes 32% approval rating is a myth circulated by the "liberal" press.

Answer 7

It has already been proved that the Bush regime does not care what American people want. I know you don't care either. Why are you worried about Sudan's civil war when we cannot resolve the civil war in Iraq. The first mess of a war needs to be resolved before we stick out noses anywhere else.
I suppose you are part of the conservative military. If not, quit standing on dead soldiers to support your point of view.

Answer 8

I'm not a liberal, but I want us to intervene too. People are dying, and we might be able to stop the violence. Marines dropped into Liberia, and the violence was subsided just by their presence.

the problem is that there is a lot of evil happening in the world, and right now we need to pick our battles.

Answer 9

Take a lesson from Iraq - believe me, the left may be crying for help in Darfur right now, but as soon as we deploy troops they'll flip-flop and start bashing the administration for invading yet another sovereign nation - we won't be much help when they publicly state we have lost the war and start producing non-binding resolutions for an immediate withdrawal.

Answer 10

Bottom line: we can't say we went to Iraq for Democracy and to defeat an evil Dictator then ignore what is happening in Africa.

I for one don't buy that we went to Iraq for anything other than OIL. With that in mind its clear why we haven't intervened in Africa. Now comes the tricky part....there's a lot of oil in Africa and its being discovered rapidly. How much longer before we decide our "National" interests reside in Africa?

We don't fight civil wars....we defend oil...and frankly, I'm ok with it.