It's a question that has been lingering for long periods of time. No person wants to take blame for their own failures, but would rather put the blame on someone other than themselves.
But why not give credit to the teacher when the student excels in school, as a teacher can find ways to motivate the students to succeed and excel in studies as in lessons with life.
Credit and blame can go both ways. As the educator brings forth methods of understanding and the solving of problems. The student needs to make the effort to listen and understand the lesson that is being taught
2007-05-28 02:49:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by spiritwaterwolf 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
That depends.
If a student isn't excelling because they don't WANT to, it's the student's fault.
But if a student openly doesn't get what someone is trying to teach them, it's up to the teacher to help them until they do.
I think, honestly, the blame shouldn't go to the teacher alone. It takes two parts to make a whole. The teacher to teach, and the student to learn.
2007-05-27 14:44:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by xxWannabeWriterxx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Parents do not want to fault their kids for failing, they would rather place the blame on the person who was trying to help in the first place, but the student would rather be an idiot and not grasp at the knowledge their being given. I would know, im the student. But my parents blame me.
2007-05-27 14:46:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sorrow 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the view of parents and society, yes. In actuality, it's usually the students fault and/or the student has a difficult time learning in a school setting, like me.
2007-05-27 14:45:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by hulidoshi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it relatively is an exceptionally reliable question and, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that i'm a white aussie, i'm able to vouch for terribly basic motives in the back of this - they DO cost practise, and that they DO artwork relatively relatively no longer elementary. there is likewise frequently a reliable experience of no longer desirous to allow the relatives down, because of the fact the entire relatives is usually making an investment (relatively actually) in one baby's practise. no longer desirous to perpetuate gross stereotypes yet you're real on your commentary that little ones from Asia do have a tendancy to artwork relatively relatively no longer elementary at their practise. Now, a tip to grasp-the way it relatively is to spend it sluggish in Asia eg China, India, Korea, Indonesia and you will start to comprehend why practise (relatively a western practise) is seen an excellent possibility and one to no longer be sniffed at. regrettably it relatively is something we don't inevitably rejoice with in greater rich countries like us of a, Canada and Australia the place get right of entry to to stronger practise is a real no longer a privilege. yet, there additionally desires to be a line drawn someplace - little ones have each and every real to be little ones and only have some relaxing. learn stats on suicide costs in Japan between scholars, its slightly sobering.
2016-12-18 06:07:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by sickels 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because neurological examinations are expensive and teachers are tax payed but parents are not.
2007-05-27 15:12:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Psyengine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
C'est la vie.
People often displace their resentments and disappointments toward others, especially when it comes to their closest family and friends.
2007-05-27 14:46:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joeri 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
because parents want they're children to look good & when they don't they blame someone else for it
2007-05-27 15:31:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by ericman315 3
·
0⤊
0⤋