Probably something similar to his "Enemies from Within" speech on 2/5/50:
The great difference between our western Christian world and the atheistic Communist world is not political, gentlemen, it is moral. For instance, the Marxian idea of confiscating the land and factories and running the entire economy as a single enterprise is momentous. Likewise, Lenin’s invention of the one-party police state as a way to make Marx’s idea work is hardly less momentous.
Stalin’s resolute putting across of these two ideas, of course, did much to divide the world. With only these differences, however, the east and the west could most certainly still live in peace.
The real, basic difference, however, lies in the religion of immoralism . . . invented by Marx, preached feverishly by Lenin, and carried to unimaginable extremes by Stalin. This religion of immoralism, if the Red half of the world triumphs—and well it may, gentlemen—this religion of immoralism will more deeply wound and damage mankind than any conceivable economic or political system.
Today we are engaged in a final, all-out battle between communistic atheism and Christianity. The modern champions of communism have selected this as the time, and ladies and gentlemen, the chips are down—they are truly down.
Ladies and gentlemen, can there be anyone tonight who is so blind as to say that the war is not on? Can there by anyone who fails to realize that the Communist world has said the time is now? . . . that this is the time for the show-down between the democratic Christian world and the communistic atheistic world?
Unless we face this fact, we shall pay the price that must be paid by those who wait too long.
2007-05-27 12:56:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
certainly, in case you knew something approximately historic past and approximately Senator McCarthy, you may understand that he may be going after communists and socialists. He and his committee have been afraid of the Russian/communist invasion. that could desire to signify that he may be investigating a majority of the democrat occasion beginning with the management in Congress and extremely Hillary along with her socialized healthcare. pass examine slightly extra unrevised, non-laptop historic past approximately McCarthy and you will extra helpful understand why your question might desire to be approximately democrats and not Bush.
2016-10-08 23:11:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by layden 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I won't tell you what I "believe;" I'll tell you what I KNOW.
Joe was a personal friend of my dad, and dad said Joe was a total nutcake. Oh, he was fun to hang around with and a riot when he drank, but politically, Joe was a nut.
Now, why would I be curious about what a nut thinks about today's Congress?
2007-05-27 14:20:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
he'd have them all on the run. some say Joe was a nut case, I think he was on to something and the liberal press crucified him. regardless I am moist dissapointed in congress today.
2007-05-27 12:40:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Communists, each and every one of the self important sons of B****s. Except for Lieberman, he is just a fence sitter....like sweden, but not as attractive.
2007-05-27 21:26:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chazman1347 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would say that the Communists won !
Be Blessed in Christ Jesus !
Minister
2007-05-27 13:59:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe he'd be absolutely correct ..
2007-05-27 12:44:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
tail gunner joe? im sure hed see a conspiracy behnd every door, jsut like int eh 50s and ay know where that got us. Joe was a psychotic paranoid, who cares what he would haev thought
2007-05-27 12:40:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by cav 5
·
0⤊
5⤋
They are all Stalinist lefty's and should be tried for treason
2007-05-27 12:38:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by DeuceRider 3
·
6⤊
0⤋
He'd cry.
2007-05-27 12:39:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋