While I don't approved completely is tyrannical hold in Cuba, at least USA was unable to topple him. USA has a history of intervention that has led to dictadorships and poverty in Latin America. Had USA was able to topple Castro, another one like him would have come to power in Cuba or any other Latin America's country. What do you think?
2007-05-27 09:04:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Cuba is a very poor country but its one of the best to live in Latin America believe it or not. Latin America is full of poverty, crime, and corruption. In Cuba crime is very low as well as corruption. If the USA would have invaded Cuba and taken Fidel out Batista would probably still have been there and he was worst than Fidel since he had ties with la cosa nostra (italian mafia) and crime was big in Cuba back then. The USA has intervened a lot in Latin America which a reason why there is so much resentment from the Latin American community. In El Salvador the USA helped murder 75,000 Salvadorians and in Guatemala nearly 200,000. So the USA has done their fair share of destruction in Latin America.
2007-05-27 09:10:03 · answer #1 · answered by NONAME 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. Until we have 100% solid evidence that right now, in 2007, Cuba is planning a war against America, first put in UN Inspectors, then severe sanctions and then if all else fails we should go in.
Like I said, that is ONLY after we absolutely POSITIVE he is planning an attack on America. That, and oil, is exactly what got the U.S. into this four year, $530 BILLION "War On Terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The same thing applies to Venezuela. MILITARY ACTION IS THAT LAST RESORT NECESSARY!
Aaron F.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AmericaForHillary/
2007-05-27 16:19:59 · answer #2 · answered by Aaron F 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe so. It seems that dictatorships have a way of working themselves out, either through revolt or gradual change. I f we would have toppled Castro we would have lost soldiers lives and we would have had to be stationed around the entire island for years to come.
2007-05-27 16:25:16 · answer #3 · answered by Big Dave 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US simply would have put a Latin-American fascist in power that would have made Castro seem like Gandhi in comparison.
2007-05-27 16:07:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Any successful effort to replace Castro would have given them a right-wing repressive stooge that would be favorable to US corporations, as long as he lived in luxury. Castro, for all his faults, is better than that.
2007-05-27 16:07:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush loves Fidel Castro. I bet you all forgot how much he supported his favorite Cuban dictator before 9/11, didn't you?
2007-05-27 16:08:13 · answer #6 · answered by THE HOUND 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If USA mind its own business and stop interfering in other nations affairs, world will finally be at peace. Once and for all! That's what i think. "REVIEW THE HISTORY"!
2007-05-27 16:26:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We put him in power, and tried to attack him once!
He's isolated and we are not going to do a thing!
Why is it everyone from the US wants to attack everybody else?
2007-05-27 16:08:18 · answer #8 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
USA should topple Bush instead.
2007-05-27 16:06:51 · answer #9 · answered by ANSWER MY QUESTION!! 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋