English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

pls feel free to make your own general (or specific) assumptions... (e.g., size, shape, speed, others)

2007-05-27 08:50:06 · 17 answers · asked by ·will¹ªm ºn vacation! 5 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

the tunguska event seems to be an interesting event.. the airburst is an intriguing phenomenon...

2007-06-03 10:33:06 · update #1

30 minutes left and it is hard to choose best answer, all magnificent answers!

2007-06-04 08:24:08 · update #2

17 answers

If they both have the same mass, the asteroid will hit harder because it is denser, therefore less will burn up in the atmosphere as it comes in.

2007-05-27 10:03:10 · answer #1 · answered by Keith P 7 · 1 0

Well how to classify this is that a comet would be an asteroid that has fallen into a gravity field and is subject to it's pull. An asteroid on the other hand is a comet that is not being eated up by a gravity field. They more or less have calculated paths they follow through space.

Either would have the same effect on the earth. Just a matter of mass and speed.

2007-06-03 05:10:05 · answer #2 · answered by Kirk Rose 3 · 0 0

All generalizations about comets and asteroids are wrong; but I’ll generalize, anyway. Comets generally have more elliptical orbits than asteroids, and they are more likely to be in a plane other than the ecliptic; therefore, they are more likely to cross our orbit with a greater relative velocity than meteors. A large comet from the oort cloud would be the most dangerous.

Comets, generally, are more like muddy snowballs, so they are more likely to explode in the atmosphere than to impact the surface. A meteor with the same mass is more likely to deliver most of its energy to the surface, doing more damage. Nevertheless, a really big comet could do a lot of damage. The Tunguska event was most likely a comet.

For a truly meaningful comparison, you would need to specify the size, density, composition, velocity and angle of impact of two specific events.

2007-06-03 03:22:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Velocity is the point: if the two are the same size, both( asteroid and comet) the speed is the deciding factor, the asteroid traveling 18 to 22 thousand miles per hour and the comet ten times that. even if the comet is made up with ice and the asteroid iron, the faster moving comet will slam the earth harder with its stored energy from a higher rate of speed

2007-06-03 07:34:35 · answer #4 · answered by johnhenrykane 1 · 1 0

All generalizations about comets and asteroids are wrong; but I’ll generalize, anyway. Comets generally have more elliptical orbits than asteroids, and they are more likely to be in a plane other than the ecliptic; therefore, they are more likely to cross our orbit with a greater relative velocity than meteors. A large comet from the oort cloud would be the most dangerous.

Comets, generally, are more like muddy snowballs, so they are more likely to explode in the atmosphere than to impact the surface. A meteor with the same mass is more likely to deliver most of its energy to the surface, doing more damage. Nevertheless, a really big comet could do a lot of damage. The Tunguska event was most likely a comet.

For a truly meaningful comparison, you would need to specify the size, density, composition, velocity and angle of impact of two specific events.

2007-05-27 10:16:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If u r considering an asteroid & comet with same mass,speed & shape then here are answer
consider a comet, much of the mass of comet is due to ice of
carbon,nitrogen,hydrogen& few others as we know, consider a asteroid,it is mainly made of hematite & other heavy metal.
Now u think is hitting with hammer of iron is more painfull or a ice cube but that cannot be considered as a reason.
Ice has lesser specific heat capacity which means ice will melt down easily to become gases but heavy metals have a different case even though they will melt down but thet have tendency to form a compact body even after melting causing more damage but ices get scattered when they melt and are moving quickly. so asteroid will melt but will be together and cause huge impact but comet get scattered and will explode in atmosphere.
If u consider same size still it is asteroid because they are more denser than comet.
If u consider distance travelled than again asteroid are champ coz when comet nears sun they start lossing their mass as a tail is formed but asteroid only losses mass when they enter an atmosphere.
considering speed it is comet since they have a huge elliptical path than asteroid this causes comet to move faster as they near sun.
so considerind all the above factor asteroid is my official champion.

2007-06-03 18:39:32 · answer #6 · answered by ksr 3 · 0 0

Gravity pull does not depend on the weight or mass. Since EARTH has a atmosphere(resistance) it depends on the aerodynamic dimension and structure of the object entering Earth and initial speed when they enter the atmosphere.

2007-06-03 05:22:47 · answer #7 · answered by vasanthkumar_22 1 · 0 0

That depends on three things.
1..The mass of the object.
2..The speed of the object.
3..How much of the object survived the plunge through our atmosphere.

2007-06-03 05:14:40 · answer #8 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 0 0

you will possibly not realize it, yet your instructors do. providing you with a checklist to do, that calls so which you will do slightly learn, isn't with regards to the checklist. this is approximately coaching you to do something on your very own, it fairly is, discover training in sturdy materials that solutions the questions you have some subject be counted. in case you return right here to have somebody else do your learn, you get a checklist that somebody else wrote and you do not learn how to do your very own learn. interior the tip, you get a grade yet grow to be a burden on society because of the fact you're actually unable to do little issues for your self. And, as i've got stumbled on many circumstances over the previous few an prolonged time, moochers placed on out their welcome and grow to be fairly depressing lonely human beings. So do your self and all and sundry you recognize a prefer and do your very own learn and do your very own checklist. this is great for the vanity and because you're in a classification that asks you to do a checklist on astronomy, i'm particular which you're able, not in basic terms of doing the activity, yet of doing it properly. And this is extra fee-effective than offering one million money to get a $20 checklist. First, no individual who can do the checklist for you fairly believes which you have one million or which you will surely provide one million for the paintings. 2nd, you may desire to get in criminal difficulty for promising the million, then not giving it to the guy(s) who do the learn for you..... perhaps I might desire to easily provide the learning and then sue you for one million. i individually might desire to apply the money to purchase new flowers for my backyard.....purely kidding. solid success ;^)

2016-10-08 22:57:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

an asteroid... because a comet will usualy break up into many small pieces before hitting earth.

2007-06-03 17:49:44 · answer #10 · answered by kleino383 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers