it works, although i would write "thorough understanding" rather than competent.
2007-05-27 07:17:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. I don't have a competent understanding and would then know I could not make sense of the conditions in N. Ireland. Very readable and understandable.
2007-05-27 14:17:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by beth l 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah the sentence itself is correct but it's sort of a redundant and useless sentence if used in an essay. Look at it this way:
To make sense of ____________________ it is essential to have a competent understanding off it.
Well, no kidding.
2007-05-27 14:20:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes, competent, means understanding....So you are using the word Understanding twice
2007-05-27 14:18:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd say yes.
I think the word competent works just fine.
2007-05-27 14:16:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by kels 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
look at it this way also .....".To make sense of the current............it is essential to have an understanding of the conflict. " I don't think one can have an incompetent understanding. Then it wouldn't be an understanding, would it?
2007-05-27 14:32:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by jujuma2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well for me is good , but your teacher will not think the same.
competent=not correct bcause it is a 1st, 2nd and 3rd person, word,and you are not talking about a 1st,2nd or 3rd person singular. you better changed to what wayne said.
2007-05-27 14:33:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by mauripaladi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
complete, or thorough
competent and understanding is to me the same thing.
my slow computer! anyways what the last three people said is true.
2007-05-27 14:29:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It isn't a word I would have chosen, although it is fine. I probably would have used:
'thorough', 'knowledgeable', 'empathetic', 'well versed', 'comprehensive'....
depending on what I intended to convey.
2007-05-27 14:20:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by waynebudd 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes it the sentance looks great to me
2007-05-27 14:16:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋