Considering it was George Bush who started the war in Iraq. He is responcible for its soldiers conduct for better or worse. The atrocities commited by some usa troops is well documented. Hence the large number of mentally ill soldiers returning home and the many that have commited suicide. The men and woman who serve im sure dont go there to murder innocent people but because of the stress of urban warefare its taking its toll on them. Bring the troops home!! Why doesnt Bush go lead a night patrol hell patton was riding a sherman through france and germany in 44and 45 and he was 64. Bush is a coward has everyone else do his dirty work.
2007-05-27 05:52:08 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Ignorant rant.
-
2007-05-27 06:04:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Do you really expect Bush to go into Iraq himself and fight? He is a LEADER, not a soldier. The "atrocities" you so glibly speak of are well documented by the liberal media, and we all know how reliable they are. And bring the troops home? Are you insane? Don't you realize how Iraq would explode into anarchy if we left? Then who would quell them? The UN? Don't think so. No, it would be America, back in there, and then where have we gone, if not backwards? And there you sit, fat and lazy, at your computer screen, complaining that the president of the United States isn't fighting like a private. Don't call him a coward unless you are in Iraq now.
2007-05-27 13:07:31 · answer #2 · answered by Ory O Oreo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and all 535 members of the most contemptible, arrogant, incompetent, cowardly, corrupt Republican-led Congress in U.S. history [that turned its back and let Bush run ripshod over our Constitution and illegally invade another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the U.S.] should ALL be tried in an international tribunal for high crimes against humanity,and - if convicted - should hang just as they all arranged to hang Hussein.
The Bilderberg Conference decided in the late 1990's that Bush and Cheney would be elected because those wealthy elitists recognized the 'need' for another 'war' - and Bush was just the stupid puppet to do it!
YES, Bush SHOULD be leading the troops in Iraq. He initiated this insipid 'war' because his family had a personal vendetta against Hussein, Cheney wanted all of Iraq's OIL, and the giant U.S. military-industrial complex needed a new 'war' to boost its sagging profits. Not to mention how the Carlyle Group and Haliburton needed to rape and pillage BILLIONS from the American taxpayers (both corporations have direct ties to the Bush White House). Bush is a cowardly lying bastard that deserves a special oil-soaked, blood-covered corner of HELL for him and all his cronies who started this immoral conflict all for the sake of OIL and WAR PROFITEERING. -RKO- 05/27/07
2007-05-27 13:32:13 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, Congress did give the President authority to use military force ,so why not try them as well. And the citizens elected the members of Congress to office, so why not try every person that's ever voted for a politician? That what you want, the elimination of every free American on the USA? And where did you say you lived???
2007-05-27 12:58:07 · answer #4 · answered by Cam 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
soldiers have died in this "war" but i think it was an "invasion".....iraq didn't prepare war with usa.....saddam didn't really want to fight the usa.......he wasn't an ally with the usa but he didn't bomb saudi arabia in the early 90's with missiles.....the gulf war made sense because saudis were getting bombed......this war seems to be based on something else that is unrelated to terrorism and saudi arabian lives.....seems to be an invasion to control oil supplies in iraq, because if oil is controlled in iraq, iran may fear the usa presence near their border, and saudis can have a tighter control on their oil supplies and influence price on oil......so if saudis can influence price on oil.....they can control oil prices with the OK from the usa congress.....so congress and saudis buddy up and make up any gas price they want and boom....we're paying $3.15 a gallon cause we bully around iraq and iran......sucks to live in this day and age where money gets sucked out of the working american and the proceeds go to arabs who don't really work and illegal immigrants who come into the usa illegally to use our resources for free
2007-05-27 13:05:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silly silly sheeple........Bush is the puppet and the puppetmasters are the arms dealers and the Carlyle group. Exxon oil shareholders never had it so good (aye Condi and Cheney).......those pricks who sell $30 million dollar fighter jets will always ensure that one of their puppets is in the whitehouse, hell theyve even got the Dems covered as well, so no matter who you vote for you get one of their puppets. Dont believe me? Kerry and Bush are both bonesmen, and Clintons first term in office was predicted when people realised he had attended a Bilderberg meeting. Wake up you silly silly sheeple,wake up before its too late.
2007-05-27 13:05:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
that is the stupidest question on here, hes finishing his dads dirty work. what do you care your sitting at home on your computer asking stupid questions. you dont know how the troops feel so why are you speaking for them. all my brothers and most of my friends are in iraq serving their country proud as can be so before you open your mouth..THINK
2007-05-27 12:57:03 · answer #7 · answered by erin44213 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ignorant rant lib...
cry now but what if we do leave Iraq a then something happens in the US. then you will say why didn't you do anything and why didn't you protect us...
2007-05-31 12:50:47 · answer #8 · answered by sandrathelover 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't it about time UBL was tried as a war criminal?
2007-05-27 19:08:09 · answer #9 · answered by SgtMoto 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. And so should Tony Blair.
2007-05-27 12:54:35 · answer #10 · answered by i_heart_retro 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋