It all sounds so great on paper... birds chirping, everybody working together for the "common good", from one man according to his ability, to another man according to his need, all that jazz. Is this notion still what draws people to this bankrupt philosophy? Ignoring the millions dead and tortured by brutal communists? Why people still insist that all failed communist societies were due solely to "the wrong people in charge"?
2007-05-27
05:17:06
·
15 answers
·
asked by
RP McMurphy
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
See what I mean? Sephiroth says communism is a "perversion". This is code for "the wrong people were in charge". Bankrupt idea, bankrupt supporters.
2007-05-27
08:21:14 ·
update #1
Even after socialism/communism killed well over 100 million people last century, liberals in America still defend it.
It's really unimaginable...
and scary.
2007-05-27 05:31:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by gorgeous george III 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Soviet Union was a perversion of socialist ideals. Socialism means economic democracy, not dictatorship. Capitalism is a dictatorship of the wealthy with enough corrupt democracy on the surface to make it look morally legitimate.
Yes, socialism is making a comeback in Latin America and if the gap between rich and poor continues to grow, it's only a matter of time before the ideas show up here again. They already are to some extent:
www.internationalsocialist.org
2007-05-27 07:42:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kronner 82 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It certainly sounds great on paper, however, we can see the implications taking place right now around the world, due to Chavez... and his stupidity!
I've never quite understood, why the Liberal party is so closely linked to communism, and nobody seems to care.
I think it goes back to the early 70's when Vietnam was going on, everyone was making it seem as though Nixon put us there... Where as he was trying to clean up the mess left to us by Kennedy and Johnson. Not only the war but they left us strapped with a horrid ecomomy!
So if you happen to be Repulican, keep up the good fight. Keep America going forward. We will overcome, as will America... We do all the time... That's how we roll!
2007-05-27 05:32:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by damond h 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
You havea good point. At the same time, one wishes there were some sort of system that could do a better job of insuring that those who can't "win at the rat race" (like the elderly, the disabled, etc.) don't get left behind.
I guess pointing to the ideals of a comunist society gives these people the feeling that there exists some mechanism to ensure that social repsonsibility is carried out. Sadly, the truth is that capitalism is the best of a bunch of bad choices...human beings are really a dysfunctional lot, and you just can't expect too much.
2007-05-27 05:22:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Are Righties still taken in by the romanticism of Facsism / Nazism?
It all sounds so great on paper... birds chirping, everybody working together for the "fearless leader", from one man according to his loyalty, to another man according to his jingoism, all that jazz. Is this notion still what draws people to this bankrupt philosophy? Ignoring the millions dead and tortured by brutal Facists and Communists? Why people still insist that all Fascist/Nazi societies were due solely to "the wrong people in charge"?
Evidence:::::
http://homepage.mac.com/chadhermann/iblog/C202808855/E20060831112506/index.html
2007-05-27 05:22:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Why people still insist that all failed communist societies were due solely to "the wrong people in charge"?
Is that what you believe?
2007-05-27 05:25:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ray D dog 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
by Onlooker - It guanantees that in case you go away your activity, you could take your wellbeing with you.********** I certainly have that now. - in case you progression to a distinctive state, you could take your wellbeing care with you..********** I certainly have that now - in case you get fairly ill and want high priced therapy, the coverage organization will nevertheless have save you as a shopper and pay for the therapy.********** I certainly have that now the only loss of freedom is on your lack of information.********sure, you have displayed your lack of information. examine slightly, learn slightly, and you're growing to be extra freedom, such because of the fact the liberty to think of for your self fairly than have sore dropping pundits feeding you lies.***************precisely! ignore with regards to the politicians that are heading off answering questions with regards to any version of the wellbeing care bill. tension your politicians to discover which version is unquestionably being seen. As you will discover, those human beings are blinded by the seen unfastened wellbeing care. they actually purchase the burden of crap with regards to the united statesNHS. obamacare can't develop your life span. it can't make you healthful. life coverage would not save you alive. house vendors coverage would not save your place from burning. automobile coverage would not ward off injuries. And scientific coverage won't make you healthful.
2016-10-08 22:41:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your definition of Liberalism is wrong...I am not a communist...I love the Constitution, do you? Which do you hold more dear, the Constitution or the flag?
Labor Unions are not permissible in China or the old Soviet Union and are a vital part of American Liberalism
2007-05-27 05:23:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ford Prefect 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes,they are and they think they are the RIGHT PEOPLE to be in charge.
Everybody in a mold and if you don't fit the mold chosen for you ,you get hammered until you do fit or DEAD.
2007-05-27 05:27:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
what about capitalism? slave trade.....
KARL MARX
THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO 1848
“ CLASS STRUGGLE”
• “ The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle”.
For example, free men and slaves, patrician and plebeians, barons and serfs, bourgeoisie and Pretoria.
• The bourgeoisie is creating lust means of production. But, distribution of income is not transformed same rate between ownership and Pretoria.
• This contradiction will produce revolutionary crises. Because, Pretoria conscious became aware of its poverty. So, Pretoria is the vast majority of population will become class.
2007-05-27 05:24:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋