2007-05-27 03:04:23 · 7 answers · asked by mickymo1 3 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Boats & Boating
Define "large"
There was another, a smallish freighter from the 1800's which was subsequently renamed. Detail here. http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/item/4208/
The third was renamed TO the Titanic by new owners.
The third Titanic began life as Daugavpils in 1965. She was a tanker of 22,630 dead-weight tons. She was 186.21 meters long overall. At some stage, she changed hands and was renamed Titanic. She was broken up some time in the 1990s. (If you are wondering what Daugavpils is, it's a small city in Latvia).
None beyond those that I'm aware of.
2007-05-27 03:16:10 · answer #1 · answered by oklatom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Generally it's considered bad luck or an ill omen to name a ship after one that has sunk.
2007-05-27 10:11:39 · answer #2 · answered by The Tenth Duke of Chalfont 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really other than ships that history has tracked. in fact i believe after, ships were better planned and had less heavy material.
2007-05-27 10:21:59 · answer #3 · answered by *~Oo `PaLOmiTa` oO~* 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definately not...................generally the Royal Navy does though.several HMS Ark Royals and submarines reuse old names . But never another HMS Hood,our finest warship to date
2007-05-27 10:07:17 · answer #4 · answered by McCanns are guilty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG!!!! THE TITANIC SANK..........WHEN??????
2007-05-27 10:08:02 · answer #5 · answered by foxy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
and who would go on it
2007-05-27 10:13:15 · answer #6 · answered by telboy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it!
2007-05-27 10:11:23 · answer #7 · answered by Paul h 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋