I don't know. They have no idea how dangerous an all liberal congress would be.
2007-05-27 02:02:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Truman had courage. But the reason that the Democrats won in November was because Rumsfeld did not resign until after the election and because the Congressional Republicans went on a lunatic spending spree and the Foley scandal did not help and the White House purchases for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve were timed to keep the price of gas up at the pump.
Thanks in part to McCain /Feingold, once you lose the House, it is extremely hard to get it back.
You are right about Vietnam. We had won that with the Paris Peace Accords and that extreme leftist Sen Frank Church and his friends essentially gave Vietnam to the moral equivalent of the NAZI Party, by cutting off military aid.
But what is wrong with the Administration is that it keeps digging a deeper hole. We should have executed Hussein, partitioned the country and got out of there. The way Reagan would have. There is no way the Sunnis and Shi'ites will make peace with each other in our lifetimes. This is like Lebanon under Reagan, we should just get out, but partition it first, so that there are Kurds, Shia and Sunni fighting among themselves. Basra should be offered to Kuwait as reparations for 1991.
The trouble now is that we have been made to look weak in front of Syria and Lebanon.
When we removed Hussein, they were all scared of us because they figured it could happen to them. Now the scum think they are safe.
2007-05-27 09:06:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
For one thing the bill Congress just passed to fund the war without a timeline also provides:
funding for military housing, veterans benefits, hurricane recovery, emergency aid to farmers and ranchers, children's health care, security improvements for ports and mass transit, and an increase in the federal minimum wage.
Come to think of it, there are actually a lot of reasons to believe this is a very good Congress.
2007-05-27 09:14:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's because they are insecure and see government programs as a way to be secure with little or no effort on their part.
Name any problem and watch the libs come up with a "painless " solution, war,proverty,health care, all are easy fixes if government is big enough.
Trouble is all that money has to come from somewhere, business and industry are leaving the states and taking jobs with them.
2007-05-27 09:08:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not the current Congress that's the problem, it's the fact that they are hogtied by our current lame duck chief Executive.
Congress listens to their constituency. They're voting the will of the people. Sometimes the real "balls" are in knowing when it's time to walk away. Like a completely un-win-able 2000 year old Holy war we know nothing about. For instance.
2007-05-27 08:57:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by jake78745 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yeah, this four month old congress is one of the worst in history, not the one we just got rid of...you know the one that had complete control of government for the past six years. How did this completely liberal congress manage to screw things up so thoroughly in just four months? What losers.
2007-05-27 08:56:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
the 28 percent approval rating congress has speaks for itself
2007-05-27 09:05:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
lack of understanding about who pays for the welfare schemes. the problem is that people like hillary have been using the republicans are for the rich and it takes a village diatribe for so long people actually believe it. for example when you compare the clintons "acheivements" in the white house, can you beleive liberals want eight more years of this...
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
bottom line, im not rich, frankly im mortgaged up to my keister, but i have priciples liberals will never understand
character matters
i know what the meaning of the word is...is
lying to a federal grand jury, regardless of subject, sholuld be punished by jail time, not an understanding and apology.
there is nothing wrong, illegal, or immoral ablout allowing me, as a working american to keep more of what i legtimately earn. its NOT ANTI AMERICAN as ill spend my money and rejuvenate the ecomomy.
the job of the governemnt is to regulate, not redistribute wealth that is for charities and churches
i think you get my point.
2007-05-27 08:55:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
I dont they act like the president when its not there job they act like there the millitary commanders aswell
2007-05-27 08:57:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jeremy P 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
That was a totally illogical rant.
2007-05-31 05:51:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by R B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋