Hillary, Obama, Edwards, or Giuliani will never be my President. McCain is alright, but Ron Paul is the best candidate, in my opinion. Both McCain and Paul are against torturing of CIA terror detainees. Paul was right on the money when he stated the reasons why we are so hate in the Middle East, and he wants to get rid of the Patriot Act, which lets the government take away Constitutional rights.
2007-05-27
01:44:09
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
I hope he's not the only honest man left, but he has my support. I certainly believe he's the best candidate for President in 2008.
I'm very impressed with his command of the facts and especially by his command of the relevant principles.
2007-05-29 18:30:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bryan Kingsford 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vote Ron Paul '08 he is the only honest man left in Washington!
Mrs. Clinton, Mrs. Obama and Mr. Edwards are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations bought and paid
for, as are almost all other candidates on both sides including their cabinets going back to Wilson.
The Trilateral Commission, CFR, Bilderberg Group,
Bohemian Grove, Skull & Bones of BOTH parties use
corporate news to tell lies to your children. The
Fourth Branch of the govt (lame-stream media) have
spent a century spinning away from their crimes!
Trilateral Commission, CFR, Bilderberg Group, Bohemian
Grove, Skull & Bones, Project for the New American
Century
Teachers and Professors blind you to the true History
of America and how it was retold by the winners:
Rockefeller/JP
Morgan/Rothchilds/Dupont/Bush
(Google: federal reserve jekyll island, prescott
thyssen, ibm nazi)
These evil puppet masters do the
bidding of their corporate paymasters who are so
afraid of the average American realizing they have
been stealing not only our FREEDOM but our hope of
providing a better life not only for our children but
also for mankind as a whole. These are the real
terrorists that are trying to take away our freedom
and democracy!
Ask your grandfather how hard work used
to be enough for anyone to live the American dream.
(Americans work longer hours and are more productive
yet wages do not increase to match the rapidly
increasing cost of food, energy, housing) Soon this
could become only a dream that will go from the
average American to the elites and their families
while the population is enslaved by the murdering
despicable thieves of liberty and the people's money:
2007-05-28 15:54:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by RON PAUL for President 2008 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're relatively in touch approximately what some older gentleman in what seems to be a trailer park has to assert approximately Ron Paul? Ron Paul is far over to the main stunning, via fact the gentleman stated. Fascism is likewise on the main stunning. i do no longer in my view see Ron Paul as a fascist, yet as a Libertarian via fact fascism is authoritarian and libertarians are the different of authoritarian. i think of in terms of the political compass, and the gents being interviewed in all probability thinks in terms of a without delay left-real line, and that could tend to make one think of somebody as far to the main stunning as Paul could certainly be a fascist. The political compass is a superb scale on which to degree people's politics. on the political compass, you could actually right this moment see a huge distinction between Mussolini (the father of fascism) and Ron Paul (a libertarian). in spite of in the event that they're almost the two to the main stunning on the financial scale, on the social scale Mussolini is up close to the main stunning of the chart (authoritarian) and Ron Paul maximum in all probability falls decrease than the midline, plenty closer to libertarian (small l). you could actually additionally see the version between the Dalai Lama and Stalin, the two on the left on the financial scale, yet the two in very diverse positions on the social scale. Stalin grew to become into way up on the main stunning, and the Dalai Lama is 3/4 of a thank you to the backside. ##
2016-12-12 03:16:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Aside from the Iraq War there is nothing mainstream about Ron Paul.
Ron Paul is an extremsist Libertarian who would do away with the entire government except the Military and Police.
2007-05-27 02:17:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by dharma_bum48326 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
I can think of two others: Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich. Ron Paul is a true Republican all the others are capitalist fascists.
2007-05-27 02:00:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by ??? 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
i think ru paul would be a better candidate and i would see it priceless as to how many of the feel good liberals would work past the gender identity issues. no ru paul is there too.
2007-05-27 02:09:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Mitt Romney 08
2007-05-27 01:49:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
So why don't liberals switch to republican if they love Ron Paul so much?
2007-05-27 01:48:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
getting rid of the patriot act would only help those who want to kill you. when will you retards learn that?
2007-05-27 01:46:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by pc m 2
·
3⤊
7⤋
He sure is.
2007-05-27 01:58:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋