English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

as Schpengler, Fukuyama and Baudrillard suggested (all for the different reasons)?

2007-05-26 22:05:18 · 9 answers · asked by aileen_the_last 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

9 answers

Isn't it exciting. We can see social evolution.

What will the next political system look like? What will society evolve into? So many interesting possibilities.

2007-05-27 00:55:20 · answer #1 · answered by guru 7 · 0 0

Are you talking of Civilization ? If so do not confine yourself to "western" or "eastern" etc. It is a continuous , evolving process and it is always moving , like the wave in the ocean. They all rise in the ocesn , run their course and get mixed back . Only to start another wave.Civilization is like that .

I am just back from 10 day trip in Egypt. The whole scene there takes you , instantly , to 3500/4000 years BC. This BC/AD happens to be an artificial point in the history of mankind. If you go there you will see civilization in full bloom thousands of years ago.

I can say that civilisation , as seen by the West will undergo drastic changes what with the rich thinkings of other civilisations. The link that economy/ prosperity has something to do with civilisation is broken. West thrives on this imaginary link

2007-05-27 01:07:06 · answer #2 · answered by YD 5 · 0 0

I think this is the capitalistic socio-economic system which has come to the logical end. Civilizations eastern as well as western continue to evolve either toward barbarism or socialism. By socialism I mean "socially organized and socially administered production by free and united working people".

2007-05-26 22:19:18 · answer #3 · answered by ali j 2 · 0 0

Definetly not! Western Civilization has been going on for almost 4000 years, anybody who believes that is crazy, it won't happen, there will be nothing logical about the end of the World.

2007-05-26 22:11:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is coming to an end through consumerism, globalism, and mass immigration.

2007-05-27 01:23:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Perhaps an illogical end would be a better way to put it.

love and blessings Don

2007-05-27 03:35:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

end is never 'logical" it becomes "logical" looking back from new beginning...if you are within ending event and environment then you are unable to see logic in there..

2007-05-27 02:33:13 · answer #7 · answered by Oleg B 6 · 0 0

Nope; I think it's just getting started.

2007-05-26 22:09:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

nope, because we still exist and while we still exist there is an opportunity for change for the better or worse.

2007-05-26 22:10:08 · answer #9 · answered by Karen D 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers