English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Too many cooks are wasting lots of time in Parliament. The Supreme Court says hang him. But unfortunately the person is not hanged. The case kept pending for a long time, year(s). Why should India have so many parties? Why should we have so many ministers/MLA's/MPS. Too many cooks gets too many plates full of food to eat. Can they eat everyday in 10 or 15 plates of food. Too many plates takes too much of place.

2007-05-26 22:04:34 · 15 answers · asked by Indian wizard 2 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

I agree with u.
A two party system is more convenient, efficient, organised & less corrupt.
India's multi party system really makes it all look complicated & confusing for no good.People keep changing parties & if somebody strong within the party isn't happy with its agenda they split & form a new party.All this disagreements among so many parties makes our system slow & inefficient.

2007-05-27 03:24:48 · answer #1 · answered by Tulip 3 · 0 0

A two party system creates politicians who try to match more to the central view of their particular parties dogma, instead of actually trying to find a middle ground that all people can agree on. The two party system is much more divisive than it is anything else. Ask the majority of americans during a presidential election, and they will tell you that they are voting for the lesser of two evils. That is probably the most telling, and depressing thing of all. You mention too many cooks in the kitchen, which is fair. But imagine two cooks, who can never, EVER agree on any particular way of cooking the meal. One says do this, the other says cooking that way makes them less of a cook. And if you cook that way then you're discriminating against the other way of cooking. At least you're getting a meal.

2007-05-27 05:30:36 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin 6 · 0 0

I will simply address the main part of your question. America actually has many parties; our system is called "two party" primarily because we have two main parties. You might recall that Ross Perot's candidacy in 1992 probably cost George H.W. Bush the presidency. There have been a few times in American politics when third parties played a tremendous role, i.e. Teddy Roosevelt's Bull Moose Party.

Considering America's presidential system with representive republican democracy, the two-party system works quite well. Bringing too many other parties into the fold too often would result in turmoil.

2007-05-27 05:29:16 · answer #3 · answered by James S 4 · 0 0

It is asystem formed long back, and it is corrupted like anything, just in a day we can not change the thing.All the people should have the same mind to elect one people to have a majority parliament,and at that time some President, should change the two party system pariliamant.Do you think it is possible now.

2007-05-27 12:56:37 · answer #4 · answered by panneerselvam s 5 · 0 0

There are in fact more than two party's in the US..but for some reason republican and democrat, have become the parties that matter...remember within these two parties you have moderate,conservative and liberal etc..
In Europe for example there are countries with dozens, and a party that has gotten 1% of the vote can keep a debate open endlessly serving only their personal politic and not the good of their country !

2007-05-27 05:36:03 · answer #5 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 0 0

The multi party system is the result of selfish politicians own priorities.
The number of parties will decrease when national interests take precedence.Then there will be fewer parties (two or three) polarising on different ideologies.
That is a healthy sign..

2007-05-27 07:27:48 · answer #6 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0 0

two party system is good where people r divided clearly on some issues if they think yes or no -manner . people must follow any one party strngly ,than only two party system can work .but in india peope r divided on every issue no leader is efficient to lead them .every time they divided the system for their own sake . they donot lead but they bluff the people .so now there is no single party which can be said true political party
yes we must have two party system to save time ,energy, and money . and natuarally the country

2007-05-28 07:34:03 · answer #7 · answered by mahima s 1 · 0 0

Sooner the better. Two party system will save the country from chaos and disintegration.

2007-05-27 13:34:24 · answer #8 · answered by chandraprakash 2 · 0 0

The two party system in the US is effective because it made America as the only superpower nowadays.

2007-05-27 06:50:53 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

Be grateful for the diversity you have. A two party system tends to produce centrist policies that are virtually indistinguishable.

2007-05-27 05:17:57 · answer #10 · answered by A Person 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers