If she won, I would assume that America would sink into the ocean. In which case I would die (better than having her as a president though). If she won, I would leave the country, or move to whichever state seceded first.
2007-05-26 20:04:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Dude, that same rule applies to the folks who said if Bush won, they'd fly to Canada. Those same ppl are still here.
Honestly, while I do not like Hillary's politics -- I'm sure she's a good person -- if she actually won, I'd be disappointed, but I'd also be curious of all of the things she said she'd do. Naturally as I would be if the opposing guy I didn't want for President.
2007-05-27 05:28:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Quonx. 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Darl'en I couldn't agree with you more, but I think the word you are looking for is not annex, meaning to add, but secede.
[[[[[ In the second half of the 20th Century, certain small rebellious groups in Texas have claimed that the Annexation of Texas by the United States was illegal, but the U.S. Courts have always ruled in favor of the validity of the Annexation, noting the Ordinance of Annexation passed by the Texas congress, and the presence of and the consent of the Texas President at the transfer of authority ceremony of 1846. Ever since that point, Texas has been the American Lone Star State except for its foray into the Confederacy in 1861-65.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Annexation ]]]]]]
Even with that said it is my understanding that Texas is the ONLY state that retained the right to secede when it joined the United States.
What would I do if she won? I'd move to a foreign country too.... oh wait... I already did!
4th gen Texan!, now proud Israeli!
2007-05-27 02:10:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sarah D 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I agree with you. I hope Minnesota would follow behind Texas. But if that didn't work I wouldn't leave the country I help spread a revolution to get back to what the founding fathers had in mind. And it's not socialism.
This is just one small reason why the 2nd Amendment was written for. Thats why the left want to get rid of it so bad.
2007-05-27 01:55:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by mak86nra 2
·
4⤊
3⤋
Ask yourself where you got your opinion of Sen. Clinton. 99% of what the anti-clinton people say are almost word for word out of the mouths of the right-wing talk show buzzards. Where do they get their information? From right wing foundations and 'think tanks'. These people have spent the last almost 18 years defining this woman as the the anti-Christess....but in reality she's been mostly moderate in her political views....but of course being 'moderate' to the reactionary right is fairly close to being some kind of red hot red. My feeling is that she'd be an excellent choice as president....she's strong on real defense issues, the environment, civil rights, national infastructure, border security and would certainly have a diplomatic advantage over the current administration and those republicans who want to be the Bush replacement. Propaganda works...so a lot of folks 'hate' this woman...that's pitiful, but that's what the current GOP is all about. Too bad...I still like Ike, but this bunch...ugh!
2007-05-27 02:06:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
Hate is a strong word. But I also really dislike her phoney attitude and scriped speeches. She scares the hell out of me, to be honest. If she was to win the presidency, WHICH SHE WON'T..I PRAY, this country would be like old Communist USSR. Socialized medicine, which means you would die first if you really needed a doctor..look at Canada. It takes months to get a vital test done, even if it's a life threatning illness that NEEDS the test done NOW, our taxes would sky rocket beyond belief, BILL would be back in the white house, even after being impeached..{this is their little scary plan}, She would remove ALL justices that are FOR the people, {remember, President Bush just fired 6, yet Billy Boy fired them ALL, when he was elected...{he sure got a pass, yet Bush was chastized}..Our rights to bear arms would be taken away, abortion would be at a all time high, along with partial birth abortions...SICK STUFF..money would be taken from each person for the illegals for medicine and school, our borders will be open to ALL terrorisis, since the Dems seem to think they are good, loving, rightous, moral people, and this country will simply go down the drain. Hillary, or Hillarious, as I call her, has a record of one too lengthy to get into here, but I agree, she would change our lives as we know them. We live in a free society, but say bu-bye to that if that witch ted. She HAS to be stopped. She will be. God will not allow such a kniving, self serving devil to run HIS land. She is the most evil woman I know, next to Rosie O'Donnell. To think she even stayed with Bill after his 200 affairs, { his words, not mine}, but what do you expect from a dyke? She wants power...We MUST STOP HER.
And you can. Go to stophernow.com. Do your part, and PRAY TO GOD for a leader to lift this country up to HIS standards...Hillarious has no morals..No Democrat does. That's why they must NOT be our PRESIDENT. To keep GOD in our great US of A..and bring Him back to where he belongs, we MUST...STOP HER. NOW!!
God bless you, and our TROOPS!! They are our FREEDOM!
ALL VOLUNTARY TOO!!! 24/7/365...they deserve more then what the Dems are giving them credit for! AMEN!!!
IF she was our Prez, I'll join you in Texas, and if your plan doesn't work, I'm leaving the country. She's a skank...Sorry for the harsh words, but they are......... BINGO!!!
2007-05-27 02:15:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Well unlike you, if a person I didn't like became president, I wouldn't abandon my country.
I can't really see why people like her either, but she seems to be competent enough to be president, unlike our current leader. Personally I think Barack "Yes his middle name is Hussein, get over it people and no he is not a Muslim nor has ever been." Obama, Rudy Giuliani, or Mitt Romney would be better suited to hold the office of the presidency than Hillary Clinton. I believe that a woman can and should be able to lead our nation, just not that woman.
What I really don't understand is why people still like Bush. He sent us into a near $9 trillion debt, got us into a war without reading all of the intelligence reports, told us half-truths and total lies to get us to support his invasion into Iraq, made more people around the world hate us, and he has been a major catalyst in in the divisive attitudes that many Americans harbor within themselves today. Also, for being a "compassionate conservative", Bush's spending habits and his expansion of government size and power are rather liberal in tone. I don't think we could do much worse that him, even Hillary appears to be a breath of fresh air compared to our current Commander-in-chief.
If Hillary won, I wouldn't desert my nation and my countrymen like you are so eager to do.
Note: I did not resort to name-calling, and didn't compare Bush to Hitler, nor anyone else. See far-left, it is possible, you don't need to delve into the ludicrous!
2007-05-27 02:18:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Liberals love America! 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
I don't think she'd be any worse than the first time she ran the presidency from 1992 - 2000.
2007-05-27 02:05:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by nada.llame 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
All I can say about that, if Hillary wins, is, I am thankful with every fiber of my being, and to God, that I live in California, and Arnold Schwarzenegger is my governor, and he wants to secede from the Union, which is a right! I will vote HIS way!
PS My second option would be a hangman's noose.
2007-05-27 02:04:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
I believe that, if Hillary is the Democratic Party nominee, we will have another Republican president. That being said, I think that she would be a good president. I think that she is too divisive to win.
2007-05-27 02:29:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by huduuluv 5
·
2⤊
2⤋