Reproductive technologies; cloning; machines that enable people like Stephen Hawking to live; computers that are "learning" language: what do such technological "innovations" mean when attempting to define "human?"
2007-05-26
14:06:20
·
6 answers
·
asked by
teeleecee
6
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
The essence of the question is really to ask whether those dependent on some form of artificial means in order to live are more human than machine, or more machine than human--or, can we really call some people (i.e. Christopher Reeve, Stephen Hawking) cyborgs?
2007-05-27
05:44:57 ·
update #1