I like to see one that's honest to get up and say I am not really all that religious. He would probably be the most honest.
2007-05-26 13:42:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Old Guy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are lots of honorable people in this country that would make a good President. The thing is, they may not have enough money.
There was a soldier who was running for office and doing pretty good. I can't remember his name or which state he was from. The bottom line was that a candidate who was already running or maybe it was the chairman of one of the parties, I can't remember, who more or less told him he wouldn't have a chance and ask him to bow out.
I would invite comments on this.
Lee Hamilton would've been a great President, but doubtful that he would run. Pat Buchannon, Al Gore, Harold Ford, John Gasch , Mayor Abrams of Louisville, to name a few.
2007-05-26 20:55:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sunny louise 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fred Thompson.
We must draft him into the position.
He thinks there is climate change occuering, but is not alarmist about it. He won't "PLAY ON YOUR FEARS" like Al Gore does. He wants us to assume responsibility for our environment and not be wastefull or extremist in handling the problems.
He doesn't want another huge government bureaucracy formed that will dictate what you must do with your life, how you should behave, what you must not eat, how much exercize you will be required to engage in, and what type, - all at high cost.
He thinks making more equitable and affordable insurance available to all would go a long way toward reducing the problems.
2007-05-26 20:53:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Philip H 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Al Gore? A guy who puts out a mockumentary based on faulty and selective scientific reporting and wants laws enacted based on these "facts"? No thank you.
Michael Savage is the only one that comes to mind who isn't running but has considered it.
2007-05-26 20:40:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Homer Simpson
2007-05-27 18:12:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anybody who isn't a politician and can make intelligent comments on the issues at hand instead of political rhetoric. For instance, I've got to think that there really is something worse than poligamy.
2007-05-26 20:41:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My mom. She is honest, intelligent and not corrupt. She might also be able to get me a sweet government job if she was the president. She could fix so many problems with her every day small town common sense. Few people seem to have that common sense thing anymore.
2007-05-26 20:45:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by ambergail1 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Doesn't matter who runs, its who will win regardless of who is on the ballot with them. And, that boils down to two names, Obama and Edwards. Getting specific isn't the issue, its getting real. And for the fellow who thinks there is more worse than polygamy, yes there is. And that would be having Romney as president who is a man that would turn the White House over to the racist Mormons in Utah. What? Are you a convert?
2007-05-26 20:42:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Michael Savage,
He has a poll running with almost 11,000,000 people
encouraging him to run, imagine how much money he
would get if each of those voters gave $10 to the cause.
Language
Borders
Culture
2007-05-26 22:15:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by justgetitright 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
First of all, Gore should not run, because he'd lose the bid to Clinton and Obama and only end up hurting Democrat voter turnout instead of helping.
I would like to see Ralph Nader run, not because I would vote for him, but because he drains away Democrat votes in Florida, helping the Republican candidate, hopefully Rudy, take that critical state.
2007-05-26 20:40:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jordan 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Evan Bayh
2007-05-26 20:44:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by jlrogers762 1
·
0⤊
0⤋