It was only 1.5 per day after the heady days following "Mission Accomplished".
2007-05-26 12:58:53 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Perhaps, but the ratio of our dead to theirs is 6 to 1 in our favor and getting better (for us).
We did accomplish that mission. We moved on to the next. How about you?
We've chosen sides in WWIII. So have you.
2007-05-28 09:29:47 · answer #1 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if we bring them all home they wont be dieing in combat. Instead they will die in car accidents seeing how we lose more US military personnel in car accidents per week than we do in combat. I can only guess that the more US military personnel that are home, and driving in cars, the higher the mortality rate will be. So..with that reasoning I guess when they do all come home you and your cohorts can start a "Keep the Troops out of Cars" campaign since their personal safety is of such interest to you. You stated "3 soldeirs died since monday. 0 died from a car accident." Yeah you dont hear about non-combat fatalities, or overall fatalities back home on CNN do you? Look it up, genius....We lose more when they are back home, and yeah they are mostly from automobile accidents.
2016-05-18 21:09:02 · answer #2 · answered by kimberli 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is a very low casualty rate. i am very thankful that more are not dying. dude, did you know that over 6000 deaths in a single day was normal in WWII. we have come a long way baby!
2007-05-26 16:19:10 · answer #3 · answered by Uno the Magnificent! 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what is the injury rate? how many legs are lost every day?
what is the suicide rate?
2007-05-26 13:07:57 · answer #4 · answered by BushSupporter 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
vote for J b Jeyarethem he can you?
2007-05-26 20:34:09 · answer #5 · answered by jeffrey b 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO.
AND I CONCUR WITH YOUR AVATAR.
2007-05-26 13:42:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋