Look at their stats (nfl.com)
2007-05-26 12:40:10 · 28 answers · asked by rams_2k7 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
More Patriot junkies out I see.
Bulger is every bit as good as Brady, maybe even better.
The problem is, the Rams don't have the defense that the Pats have, therefore they lose more games. Rams have a better running game also, so less passes are needed.
And to all that say the crap about not having rings, I have a newsflash for you, they give rings to championship TEAMS.
The QB isn't the only person on the team that gets a ring for Christ sake.
May the Patriots crash and burn.
2007-05-26 13:36:24 · answer #1 · answered by Mr R 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well he was picked ahead of Tom Brady in the 2000 draft so apparently people thought he was better. Clearly he is not, Brady has 3 rings, and is "Mr. Clutch." Bulger not a bad QB, but he is no Tom Brady not by any means. Stats don't make a player great, they help you can't base a comparison on just stats. For instance when the Patriots played the Bears Grosman had similar numbers to Brady, but is he as good as Brady? Clearly not so that just proves the points stats aren't everything.
2007-05-26 14:04:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it doesnt take stats for me to know Brady is a better QB than Trent Green, Mark Bulger, or Drew Brees who all have had tremendous seasons. But Bulger doesnt have the system Brady has and I think that is what sets most QBs apart. The rings. And no QB can do it alone, not even Peyton manning who got some GREAT HELP from its defense in the playoffs and Dallas Clark his TE. If Brady and Manning were on the Lions and Browns, things would be a lot different. It is all about schemes and what a coach ALLOWS his players to do. But short answer NO because Bulger is not a leader when it counts and always got hurt. GOT SWEPT BY MY NINERS!!! Would Brady or Manning get swept by them, I sadly don't think so.
2007-05-26 12:48:45 · answer #3 · answered by krazy_azian 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no way that Marc Bulger should ever be considered better or as good as Tom Brady. He hasn't led his team to a respectable playoff game while still having a very feared tandem of receivers with the likes of Tory Holt and Isaac Bruce. Tom Brady doesn't not have any stand out receivers and consistently gets into the playoffs year after year.(Deion Branch is not a stand out wr even though he was mvp for the super bowl. Look what he does now).
2007-05-26 14:25:53 · answer #4 · answered by jerry_r_8834 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you look at numbers then you must look at all the stats. Wins and playoff achievements should be included as well. If you look just at the regular season stats especially in per game values Marc Bulger's are slightly better than Peyton Manning's , but would you make that comparison as well. Tom Brady is just better than Marc Bulger
2007-05-28 05:33:24 · answer #5 · answered by giantsfan2002_69 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to the guy above me declaring peyton is whiny, you're a moron. he's in no way complaining to refs about calls and a minimum of he isn't any longer a contact pooswa that calls roughing the passer consequences for the ref each and every time someone receives interior of 5 ft of his knee. Peyton Manning is hands down the proper QB interior the pastime. call yet another QB who training the sector as ideal as he does. he's the organic and organic definition of a field primary. The colts does no longer be almost the crew they're with out him, which include if brady or brees were on the crew. no man or woman is as consistent as Manning, no man or woman throws a much better suitable ball than Manning, no man or woman has more advantageous suitable verbal change with his receivers, and no man or woman has ever worked as complicated as Peyton does. Peyton Manning is the Indianapolis Colts and Peyton Manning is the NFL. Brees is a surprising quarterback, yet he isn't any longer the significant significant clarification why the Saints are reliable now: before their secure practices replaced into more advantageous, they have been a mediocre crew at proper. Brady has continually has a reliable secure practices on the decrease back of him, some thing Manning and Brees have not continually had. Now that the Pats d isn't that reliable, you be conscious that they are suffering. Roethlisberger does no longer belong interior an identical classification as those 3 and by no potential even the insane steelers followers would argue that he does if his secure practices hadn't received 2 large bowls for him.
2016-11-27 21:53:50 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Marc Bulger is not a better QB that Tom Brady.
2007-05-26 20:39:41 · answer #7 · answered by I try 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom Brady easily, Marc Bulger has one of the best receiving tandums in the league with holt n bruce. While until this offseason brady has had to deal with sub par recivers. Brady has the rings and the wins
2007-05-26 13:03:36 · answer #8 · answered by jusballin999 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY! superbowl rings mean anything to you? They aren't even on the same level. Tom is WAY better than Bulger. Brady has never even had a star wide receiver to throw to.
2007-05-26 13:32:58 · answer #9 · answered by rockstar44 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A few years ago Bulger's coach (Mike MArtz at the time) was too afraid to let Bulger throw the ball in the playoffs.
If his coach couldnt trust him, how could you take him over Tom Brady.
2007-05-26 12:42:49 · answer #10 · answered by iswthunder 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋