English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-26 10:57:58 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

16 answers

No. Birds are supposed to be free. That's the exact reason why I don't have one.

2007-05-26 11:00:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

that reminds me i killed my friends pet bird he threw me into a river and .i would not throw rocks at u if u let my bird free causei would get a chance to shoot a bird with a shot gun

2007-05-26 11:04:03 · answer #2 · answered by flippy 2 · 0 0

Well it would be pretty difficult for u to set my pet bird free as I dont actually have one lol thanks for the 2points though

2007-05-26 11:01:24 · answer #3 · answered by missthong2003 3 · 0 0

Nope, but you would have to wait for me to first get a bird. Can you handle that??

2007-05-26 11:02:04 · answer #4 · answered by johN p. aka-Hey you. 7 · 0 0

No. But I'd get mad if you set me free ;)

2007-05-26 11:00:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iam not going to get mad about anything tonight, did that last night

2007-05-26 11:01:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would kill you. i love animals and they would not be used to the climate and they would die. that swhy i have a huge walk in bird cage so they feel free and happy.

2007-05-26 11:03:35 · answer #7 · answered by guys~r~confusing 4 · 0 0

No I wouldn't ..especially if I owned one ...I hate those kinds of birds...

2007-05-26 11:01:37 · answer #8 · answered by Ken and Wendy M 6 · 0 0

Yes I would

2007-05-26 11:00:29 · answer #9 · answered by carly 3 · 0 0

I don't have one.

2007-05-26 11:02:05 · answer #10 · answered by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers