English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have never, (to answer that question). I want to know from a purely psychological point of view, are the experiences of temporary influence worth the resources? Why do you do it (that is for all non-physiologically addictive drugs)?

2007-05-26 09:47:59 · 5 answers · asked by London 5 in Social Science Psychology

5 answers

I've had two glasses of wine, so don't understand your Q at all! Aren't ALL? I know that the anti-anxiety meds I take, take the edge off of life and make my life more satisfying. I'm retired with an MA and Ed. Spec. degree--but the cost of meds are well worth the peace and accomplishment I get!! The meds are not addictive, but certainly enhance my life. I could go off them--but then suffer the gut-wrenching anxiety that I did the first part of my life.... I used to medicate the anxiety with alcohol and that's certainly addictive. I guess all remedies are addictive. And one has to chose which option has the least adverse effects!! Then, I may not understand this at all.

2007-05-26 10:29:04 · answer #1 · answered by Martell 7 · 1 1

a million. something that the mother consumes the newborn consumes i.e if she would not consume plenty, neither does the newborn and that's born relatively small. So if she takes heroin so will the newborn and medicines are addictive so the newborn would be addicted. 2. they're going to in all hazard sense an identical thoughts of any addict giving up drugs, yet i'm unsure. 3. same as question one, the drug will enter the newborn's physique for the duration of the umbilical cord and it will get the newborn addicted. 4. No 5. the newborn would have withdrawal symptoms. 6.they can't provide unlawful drugs to a infant because it might kill it. They bypass chilly turkey. 7. the newborn would die from withdrawal. 8. i do no longer think of so.x

2016-11-05 11:58:00 · answer #2 · answered by wolter 4 · 0 0

I think this is a very general question because there are so many anti depressant medications on the market that are non addictive. There are also so many kinds for different chemical imbalances in different people. Some meds work well for some people and the same meds work bad for others. It all depends on what chemical the patient in not producing enough of. Such as, Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). These are mainly for people who are depressed because depression sometimes is a lack of production of serotonin in the brain, and these meds help those with this specific diagnosis. hope this helps

2007-06-02 18:58:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Depends on the drugs how they make you feel. Some are not physically addictive, but can be 'addictive-like' to the mind. It's the chemicals that are in them that make you feel and think differently, that's why they are called mind-altering. Magic mushrooms are illegal in most countries, they are not addictive, but they make you see (and sometimes hear) things that aren't there. Cannabis makes you feel sleepy and so does St John's wart (which is legal in most countries). Cammomile makes you sleepy and is legal (not even considered a drug). Poppy seeds as in the ones on bread and bagels, can make you sleepy too.

Why people do it? Because they want to feel something they don't normally feel in their life. Some people use it to sleep better or to feel less stressed. Not all people are druggies.

2007-06-02 17:46:10 · answer #4 · answered by Chava 3 · 0 1

pot is pretty non-addictive and I smoked it twice but it never got me high

2007-05-26 10:08:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers