2007-05-26 09:30:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The problem in Iran has nothing to do will oil, it is a factor but is not the main reason. Iran is the chief supporter of terrrorism, we owe this to IRAN for the hostages and other things. One day we will have to hit this country hard.
2007-05-26 09:40:47 · answer #1 · answered by jim l 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
not extremely, Saddam needed extra money for his oil which Bush refused so Saddam threatened to alter the forex for figuring out to purchase Oil from the greenback to the Euro, Bush theory this grow to be unacceptable and desperate to achieve this and scouse borrow the oil fairly and that's precisely what he did. as quickly as he invaded he secured the oil fields and placed an American Oil great in fee ( i think that's Amoco yet i'm not completely particular of this call) who're nevertheless controlling the extraction of that oil at present. because of the fact u.s. now not has any substantial oil reserves of its very own it could in basic terms save on doing what it did to Iraq, i.e stealing oil of countries that cant safeguard themselves (the yankee way) beware Iran, your next. ATB purple
2016-10-08 04:18:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bush administration is trying its damnedest to find a plausible excuse for the invasion of Iran. They already know "weapons of mass destruction" won't work, but if they can come up with something that toxic waste-mouth Rush Limbaugh's 'ditto heads' will 'buy', the Bushites WILL definitely attack Iran before they leave office. Bet on it! -RKO- 05/26/07
2007-05-26 09:38:51 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No you won't . You had made it in Iraq and it turned to be bad for you because the whole project is going to be fruitless . So I don't think you're going to do the same risk again . What does politics mean ? This is the answer .
2007-05-26 09:38:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Something tells me that decision has already been made, and who they trade with or for what will likely not impact any military use. It's more about control of resources in my eyes.
2007-05-26 09:37:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, only because they are starting to build nuclear weapons. I don't think we'll invade because of oil. Not everything revolves around oil.
2007-05-26 09:44:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonnnn24424 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who knows.
I think the US needs a new direction in politics. Arent
you american tired of the sex direction (Democrats) vs
the oil moguls (Republicans) ?
2007-05-26 09:40:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
hell sure why not, if the premier of Iran farted they'd invade iran!
2007-05-26 09:34:26 · answer #8 · answered by IshotJR 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes
2007-05-26 09:32:58 · answer #9 · answered by . 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who, the europeans.??
2007-05-26 15:07:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋