English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

They get it, they just don't want to acknowledge because of the "blame America" craze that sweeps other nations and somehow trickles into our country.

2007-05-26 07:39:00 · answer #1 · answered by Dan 4 · 3 3

Why can't you realize that there is no way some people with nothing more than boxcutters could outsmart the military, the F.B.I., the C.I.A., the Pentagon, the President, and the rest of Our leadership, and just take over with nothing more high tech than boxcutters? Either that, or you think that our country's leaders are just that stupid!
Do you realize that there are antimissle batteries that surround not only the WhiteHouse, but the Pentagon as well, and that for a plane to hit the Pentagon, someone ON THE INSIDE had to shut those batteries off? Or are you insinuating that somehow, a boxcutter weilding lunatic actually got into the Pentagon as well to do this? Why were the AirForce Interceptors called off on 911, when they had scrambled to intercept? It is proceedure to call the AirForce and scramble fighters ANYTIME a jet, either commercial, or private veers off coarse and heads towards the WhiteHouse, Pentagon, or ANYWHERE except where they are supposed to go! This is STANDARD OPERATING PROCEEDURE, not some whim of an air traffic controller. BUT, someone in the WhiteHouse called the fighters back. Why? Did you know that Larry Silverstein, leaseholder of the Towers, took out massive insurance on the Complex, and stipulated that in case of terrorist attacks, He would get 7 billion dollars?, Or that the Trade Towers were actually costing him a fortune, as they were loaded with asbestos, had major electrical problems, as well as faulty wiring for internet, and that most of the offices were unleased, thereby NOT bringing in any money? It would have cost a fortune to bring those buildings up to code! Why was Larry Silverstein caught on video saying "Pull building 7", demolitions term for blowing a buildings internal supports, and dropping it into it's own basement? Building 7 WAS NOT hit by any plane, but was destroyed. How did the bones of so many people in the Towers wind up so far away from the site, and why were they fragmented down to the size of peagravel? Thew ONLY way this could have happened is if the buildings were blown up with high explosives! One persons remains were found in over 6000 pieces! Why are the base supports on the towers(Plainly visable in the videos on 911) ALL cut at 45 degree angles? That is what you do when using explosives to demolish a building. You cut the support columns in the basements, weaken the structure by placing squibs(Smaller explosives) along several floors throughout the buildingto cut supporting members, then blow the thing using timed explosions to get the most effect from the blasts. Several steel buildings in the U.S. have burned from fires, some for as long as three days, and at temperatures a lot hotter than kerosine jet fuel, and they remained standing, but not the Towers. In the videos of the Pentagon, where are the bodies from the plane? Where are the seats, the luggage, the engines, and all the wreckage? Planes do NOT just vaporise! It takes a blast furnace to melt the landing gear on a commercial jetliner, and it would take about 6 hours of blast furnace temperatures to destroy the landing gear to the point where no trace of them could be found afterwards, but, SOMEHOW, these landing gear assemblies just "vaporised" with nothing more than jet fuel to burn them? B.S.! Wake the he!! up, and pull your head out! Do a little research, WITH AN OPEN MIND! Don't just buy into the stuff you WANT to believe, but actually do a little investigative research.

2007-05-26 15:05:56 · answer #2 · answered by Darqblade 3 · 1 0

Unfortunately, people will never agree on this issue. Americans , well, most of us, know that this is true. Radical Islam has declared Jihad against Americans and that is acceptable to the majority of the world. But when we declared war on terrorism, then we once again became the big evil in the world. We have the right to protect ourselves. And we will continue to do so, regardless of what everyone else thinks.

2007-05-26 14:41:30 · answer #3 · answered by Candace C 5 · 4 2

PLEASE read "The Looming Tower" by Lawrence Wright - for those of us who do believe that radical islam was the cause of 911 and many other terrorist plots, it's like talking to the choir - but for Americans who want the entire truth about what was and is behind terrorism it's a MUST READ book.

2007-05-26 15:11:25 · answer #4 · answered by mary r 1 · 0 2

Read and be enlightened:
"The 9/11 Commission Report Omissions and Distortions", by David Ray Griffin

2007-05-26 15:05:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Now that raises the next question- What is the cause of radical Islam? The hen or the egg?

The truth hurts.

2007-05-26 14:38:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

That would not fit into the scheme of political correctness. I think we should go back and try to understand the Nazi's and then we could understand why it was those pesky Jews who brought on their own fate, much like the Americans of the day.

2007-05-26 14:40:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Are you confusing blame with responsibility and accountability.

How it is irresponsible and unaccountability that has made super human fire retardant villian’s of 19 arabs who were never on the flights, who flew precise flight paths and hit precise targets. SURVIVED SAID FIERY IMPACT to come back to life to rig WTC'1 and 2 to blow up in a nice controlled dust heap, and seven hours later these super human fire retardant 19 Arabs came back to life to rig WTC 7 and blow it up into a nice controlled dust heap.


Keep on blaming those fictitious super human villians dubbed "Al Qaida" by Neo-Con thought control major media networks.

You really shouldn't give such lies free rent in your head it breaks out in uncontrollable wars.

2007-05-26 14:45:18 · answer #8 · answered by andy r 3 · 2 2

Saudi Arabian Wahabbist theology was the cause. That is the source.

2007-05-26 14:39:56 · answer #9 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 2 2

Primarily cause it wasn't.

2007-05-26 14:54:24 · answer #10 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers