Why would the Govt Kill its own people on 9/11?
They killed there own people so they would gain Power as a one world Government, A one world powerful evil
They are now taking freedoms worldwide, as we lose freedoms, and they have more control. They targeted the U.S. Because they were the SuperPower of the World
And needed Freedom Loving Americans To beg to give up there rights. The NWO is gaining More Power
as We are also Moving towards a North American Union, Where Mexico, and Canada Would Merge Together. We are moving into a Dictaorship.
In 1139 St Malachy Had a vision from God that we would have 112 Popes, We are at 111 Popes, with this pope being 80 years old.
The next pope will be the 112th, and Is expected to be the false Prophet to welcome in the Antichrist of the NWO, The World Wide SuperPowerful Evil, As we move towards
the end of the 6000 years as mankind has been on the earth.
Why dont the media tell the truth?
The Media is covering up 9/11 Because They are owned by 4 very corrupt Cooperations such as GE, AOL, DISNEY, Etc.., Which are profitting
heavily from the Illegal Wars in the Middle East, They are also Under-Control of the NWO. When the Antichrist Takes Power of the WorldWide Dictaorship, The Media will be under
Complete Control of Him. The Free Speech on the internet Will be Gone!!
2007-05-26 07:37:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
that is a good one but i can answer without seeing it that this is the case. of course people wanted to be mislead which helps. i am not saying what was done was right but if bush or any President had said we are going to war for oil would the people have backed them to the extent they did. also if a President had said '' the only way to stop the wars we will be involved in is to switch to a new source of energy'' would this have been popular with oil workers well if the president gave new jobs to them yes. switch from oil to electric for car workers ,windmills and windmill maintnence for oil workers but what then they will ask. tree planting. once that is done what next. there could be cleaning up toxic waste. a job with a sizable hazzard which others already handle. garbage could be scented and used for fuel
2007-05-26 07:45:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by darren m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The entire loose change movie is garbage. They are disrespectful people that made that movie, and almost every point in it is dead wrong, not reasearched, or taken from headlines that were released only days after 911 and were since proved wrong.
Here's a wonderful guide that points out the hundreds (Note: HUNDREDS) of discrepencies and problems in that awful and entierly disrespectful movie.
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
Everytime someone believes the contents of that film, the coutry gets a little more devided and the world gets a little worse. Awful.
2007-05-26 07:37:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by UZ 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
What is wrong with these people that think their own government wouldn't hurt them!? They think the government would not want to destroy itself? Ladies and gentlemen that is exactly that whey want you to believe. They want you to listen to every word they say and believe it. Our government is corrupt just like all other governments on this earth. The evidence it out there and in your face everyday but you don't want to believe it. Not everyone who works for the government is bad but you can bet your bottom dollar that the guys in power will sell your soul for a nickel without your permission. These people who don't believe in 9/11 being an inside job scream show the evidence but yet they don't show evidence supporting their claims...oh wait yeah they do, their evidence it quoting someone else saying 9/11 was not done on the inside and those who think so are nuts. I challenge all who don't believe to show us "nuts" actual video that doesn't show the buildings blowing up. Show me footage of a building collapse that turns into fine dust when it falls. Show me the evidence that a proper investigation had taken place. I'd advise everyone to spend some time watching Vegas demolition's and tell me BLD. 7 wasn't taken down Vegas style. Show me video of the plane hitting the Pentagon. There were several cameras on the Pentagon. You have no video. I have no video. No plan hit it!. I can go on and on about this but the 9/11 non-truthers wouldn't care anyways. just simple minded. I'm not mad at them though. Just go on and be the dumb sheep you have been trained to be.
2007-05-26 08:48:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by X X 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush had a $four hundred billion deficit after eight years Obama has a $a million.7 trillion deficit after 18 months. Well, that is considering the fact that Obama inherited a deficit of $four hundred billion, and Bush inherited a surplus. Bush spends tens of billions to bail out banks. Obama spends hundreds and hundreds of billions to bail out banks, as good as automobile brands! Many liberals truthfully do not aid the bailouts, as we do not like companies, and so they need to fail in the event that they deal with their companies like they did. Bush took four days to reply to Katrina Obama had no plan for the BP oil spill after over eighty five days and 250 million gallons What would Obama have performed that BP did not? Libs referred to as Afghanistan "Bush's Vietnam" and a whole failure Obama sends 20,000 extra troops it combat & die there. You ought to ship troops to shield the safeguards which are in situation as you slowly evacuate the nation. And, just a fraction of the ones troops will die there, and 20,000 is not anything in comparison to what Bush despatched. Libs referred to as Bush's Iraq Commander "General Betray-Us" and Bush's lap puppy. Obama indicators the equal man as much as be the Commander in Afghanistan. Petraeus acquired stuff performed. Although he won't have performed the high-quality activity he would have in Iraq, he is the high-quality guy for this activity. Bush finishes studying to basic college scholars upon information of the 911 assaults Obama remained to conclude his golfing recreation upon information of the BP oil spill. I agree that that is dangerous.
2016-09-05 12:58:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where is hard evidence for it? All I see is circumstantial. Where is the finger print of US gov?
Bin Laden have pretty good circumstantial evidence. He attacked WTC before, attacked US embassy abroad, US navy ships...etc. He declared war, Jihad on the US. I'll say that's pretty good.
http://www.debunking911.com/
2007-05-26 10:09:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Come off it. I wondered at one point but have disregarded it on the grounds that it really doesn't make any sense except for conspiracy theorists.
2007-05-26 09:54:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Beau Brummell 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i have seen this movie.and it changed my view of everything.no wonder colin powell resigned after bush was made president.even condolezza rice is turning bad too.we can only hope that bush and the republicans get out of officce by next year....
2007-05-26 08:40:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by dbsantos77 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you really believe that?
Even the guy who paid to distribute "Loose Change" doesn't believe that. He thinks (erroneously, it seems) that if people really see the movie, they will know it's nonsense.
2007-05-26 08:40:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by The First Dragon 7
·
1⤊
0⤋