It is not very good.
Hillary Clinton is an unethical and selfish woman. Now she wants to be president. Her craving for power and wounds from failures on a monumental scale are driving her to put our country at risk again.
that is a quote
2007-05-26 10:57:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
I think her campaign for President is a huge mistake. This country still has a huge submissive female population, based on christian and catholic backgrounds that grinds against women in positions of authority. We are still very much a male dominated society, and the women vote that Hillary would need will not come close to fill the gap necessary to win. Personally I don't have a problem with her as the President. I think she would be an intelligent, passionate and faithful leader loyal to the oath of the office of the President.
But I think that her winning the Democratic ticket plays right into the Neo-Con agenda. If she wins the Democratic ticket I would support her over all of the republicans except Ron Paul.
2007-05-26 14:15:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by andy r 3
·
5⤊
7⤋
She is bright and politically savvy but its doubtful that she would be able to win a general election. Very few NE dems are palatable to southern states and you need a few of those to win in Nov.
Hard to imagine 2 families controlling the white house for 24 years
2007-05-26 14:14:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Hillary is ambitious. Whether her lust to become President has anything to do with the good of the country is the $64,000 question. I think her legacy as First Lady was unfullfilled and she aims to correct that. She wants out from under Bill's umbrella(hey, hey!) Personally, I think she is more sizzle than steak.
2007-05-26 14:39:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Campo 4
·
3⤊
5⤋
Hillery would paint an orange purple and convince her loyal followers it was a large grape - and they'd believe her.
She voted for the war and supported it afterwards - as soon as she started campaigning and digesting the polls and checked the direction of the political winds, she flipped-flopped so badly that she made John Kerry look resolute and committed in his positions.
We don't need someone of her ilk at the helm, there are simply too many serious concerns presently facing this nation.
2007-05-26 14:17:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
4⤊
6⤋
My honest opinion is that she's a strong and brilliant candidate who could be the best thing to happen to this country in a long time. She's qualified and I think she has a great plan for Iraq and for restoring our reputation with our Allies. She'll form a cooperative task force with our Allies to combat terrorism around the world, and she'll extract us from this civil war so we can attend to that. And she knows that we can't leave Iraq to the Iranians and Al Queda, she intends to leave residual forces on the borders and in the outer areas where Al Queda is setting up camp. I think she'll actually do something about our broken health care system. She learned a lot from her failed attempt at Hillary Care back when and there are politicians interested in this from both sides of the aisle. She'll actually do something about our borders and ports too. For many reasons, these and many others, she has my vote.
2007-05-26 14:20:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
8⤋
Make no mistake she is a Zionist controlled globalist scumbag of the worst kind. She thinks she is a member in good standing of the ruling elite. She fully supports a Zionist controlled world government and as such has no concern for us or this countries Sovereignty! She is a major part of the problem not part of the solution!
2007-05-26 14:32:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by sx881663 4
·
0⤊
8⤋
She is very fake and in that way not much better than Bush and her big issue is health care. On the plus side she is probably the toughest person running and could do the job jest fine. I will be voting for Obama or Gore but if she gets the nomination to run she will get my vote as the lesser of two evils.
2007-05-26 14:11:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by crownliftman 3
·
6⤊
9⤋
She's an opportunist who will make cosmetic changes without doing anything substantial enough to really help America.
2007-05-26 14:10:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by BOOM 7
·
7⤊
6⤋
I think she is as divisive and deceptive as anyone in politics. Her double-speak drives me crazy as does her compulsion to change her accent to fit her audience.
2007-05-26 14:22:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
5⤋