English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I didnt see the whole fight but all od a sudden it seemed like rosie brought up the fact that she was a "loud mouthed lesbian" or something and that elizabeth was a "pure christian" Where did that come from? Did rosie just pull that out of her butt to get people against elizabeth?

2007-05-26 04:13:11 · 18 answers · asked by Lauren. 4 in Entertainment & Music Television Talk Shows

18 answers

rosie does not think. if she did, she would still be there next week. she is her own worst enemy all of the time. who cares what her sexual preferences are anyways?

2007-05-26 04:16:27 · answer #1 · answered by cadaholic 7 · 5 1

I saw that whole fight, it was a ridiculous argument. I think Rosie was trying to say that everyone thinks she is a "loud mouthed lesbian". Nobody likes loud mouthed people who go against what everyone else thinks or believes. On the other hand you have Elizabeth who was a "pure christian" something that a lot, not all, people in America believe in. A lot of Christians and Catholics do not believe in same sex marriage. I really just think Rosie is obnoxious. I have thought that since she had her own show.

2007-05-26 04:18:15 · answer #2 · answered by jeno75831 3 · 4 1

I like Rosie, but sometimes she gets fed up and pops off at the mouth. I dont remember that particular incident, but their friction has been brewing for a while. So often Elisabeth says some pretty stupid things-if you take her literarly and dont let her explain what she meant. She doesn't always pick her words correctly. So Rosie will go off on her...sometimes I think she's just got some deep resentment towards EH and dont really blame her. Elisabeth acts a little privelaged sometimes, she also acts like her republican sh*t don't stink. I can relate to Rosie more, blue collar, frank way of speaking...whatever, its good TV!

2007-05-27 10:19:50 · answer #3 · answered by ShaMayMay 5 · 0 0

Because she is not stupid.

She knows that is how people judge her, and she was right on the money with that wasn't she?

The thing with Rosie that people don't understand is that, like with all celebrities, it's the public that pushes you to extremes.

What has she said that was so terrible?

Donald Trump that pompous ugly a.s.s. supports some little tramp who's lesboing on the side, boozing and doping while representing Mz. America and forgives the little trollip...so who isn't outraged that some moron with power can do what he wants and send out these signals to young girls. As parents (as decent ones anyhow) I would have thought you would have sided with Rosie on that.

Hey, so she made fun of him...who hasn't? Someone with all that money can afford to see his wife's plastic surgeon or a hairdresser and do something about that ugly mutt, especially if he wants to flaunt it on TV.

As for everything else she's said, she's always been right. Maybe she was pushy or rude about it but hey, maybe she was being set up for it all and maybe she was fed up with it all....everyone has their breaking point..... and good for her for tackling Elisabeth...perhaps her twinkle toed naive views were every bit annoying to Rosie as Rosie's hard nosed I am what I am and WTF do I care what you think about it views were to Wittle Wizzy.

I guess it depends on whether you were raised with rosed coloured glasses or street smarts, where your loyalties lie.

Those who live with their heads in the sand really don't have a right to talk about what they never get to see, if you know what I mean.

2007-05-26 06:35:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Rosie was stating that the media would be patronizing Rosie for attacking Elizabeth. However, she was!

2007-05-26 04:17:15 · answer #5 · answered by JOEY/ KATH K 2 · 1 1

she was "attempting" to show how the media would spin it. her theory being she was just make a fair point and the media would characterize it in a way to favor Elisabeth. unfortunately she is a loud mouth lesbian who unfairly attacked poor little Hassellbeck. (I feel bad for that days guests). it wasn't a fair fight, in a battle of wits Rosie has her outgunned and in a different weight class (I swear no pun was intended on that last one).

2007-05-26 04:20:08 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. 210 7 · 3 1

Hey sorry but Elizabeth is always coming across that way and Rosie was just pointing it out in her loud ROSIE way. I can't stand Elizabeth and "I'm always right" ways. Rosie at least tells it like it is and that is what makes the show interesting.

2007-05-26 04:19:24 · answer #7 · answered by kitkat 7 · 3 4

We don't know for sure, as we are not involved personally.

I DO think Rosie is not careful of her words. There is nothing wrong with criticisms, but NO ONE has the right to make personal judgements.

What I REALLY think is that this fight was planned.

2007-05-26 04:20:05 · answer #8 · answered by lune_ellise 3 · 4 1

No, I think her approach was to distinguish the difference of opinions between two different people .( Rosie - Liberal, Elizabeth - Conservative)

2007-05-26 04:17:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Nearest i'm able to ascertain ... ... it really is a want on the part of those who've thoroughly rejected the sacraments to outline on their personal words between both (out of seven) they have held onto in a changed style in basic terms because Jesus actually stated "attempt this". (He did not element out "attempt this symbolically in some style", even with the reality that.) when you extremely study Scripture as an finished extremely of plucking out a verse right here and a verse there interpreted with the help of a Western, English-conversing clear out, toddler baptism is totally Scriptural -- and so is baptism of converts as adults. both were practiced with the help of the early (first- and 2d-century) Church. Methinks the dissenters are a contact at a loss for words. on the single hand they insist "baptism doesn't forestall" and on the different that baptism calls for repentance and a call to save on with Christ on the part of the baptized yet is in basic terms an ordinance. if it extremely is the case, then they ought to haven't any objection to toddler baptism, considering that in accordance to their perspectives the toddler is in basic terms getting moist. or perchance they are not at a loss for words in any respect, in basic terms allergic to at least some thing being referred to as a sacrament.

2016-11-27 20:31:14 · answer #10 · answered by merryman 4 · 0 0

I am sure she did. Guess Rosie has heard what peole have to say about her and has repeated it. Rosie is one who speaks prior to thinking and it has and will continue to get her in trouble.

2007-05-26 04:16:32 · answer #11 · answered by someones friend 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers