English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

according to me Saeed anwar because he was always match winner. when india needs sachin. then sachin doesn't play good.

2007-05-25 23:51:35 · 21 answers · asked by dani 2 in Sports Cricket

21 answers

yes doni,
To Me,
It's Saeed anwar,
simply because he was always the match winner4 Pakis. when India needs sachin. ?
aint do nothing,...almost.

Better to watch is... Saeed anwar.
we miss him in the cricket field ,honestly

2007-05-26 03:27:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Tendulkar is definitely the more talented player and a great entertainer but Saeed Anwar is a better overall player. What good is talent when the player doesnt perform when needed the most? Tendulker will be long remembered after he has retired simply coz he's flashy and a fan favorite. Saeed even though a better over all player and delivers when needed wont be high up in the ranking coz he doesnt show up in the highlight reels as much.

2007-05-26 07:56:57 · answer #2 · answered by Mavs rule 6 · 0 0

No doubt. That is saeed anwar. The match winner 4 pakistan. The highest innings scorer in odi. Sachin is a good player but he never playd 4 the team. When we expected his perwomance in world cup he cheated all ag srilanka n bangladesh. bt doing well in da test series against bangladesh. so anwar is the best. he had a nice strike rate, average.

2007-05-26 19:08:33 · answer #3 · answered by kokulan v 1 · 0 0

Just because Sachin is past his best and struggling for the past two years, you cannot rate Saeed above him.
Overall Sachin is still better than Saeed.
Sachin too has got some memorable knocks.

2007-05-26 01:22:27 · answer #4 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0 0

obviously tendulkar. you can't judge a player by saying that sachin doesn't play good in crucial matches.sachin is far way ahead of anwar.He has played far more memorable knocks than Anwar if u can remember.u can say that he has not played to his potential in past few years but what about the cricket that he has played from 1989 till now. for your question the best answer is to COMPARE THE WORLD CUP MATCH THAT WAS PLAYED BETWEEN IND Vs PAKISTAN IN SOUTH AFRICA. IN THAT MATCH SAEED ANWAR SCORED 101 RUNS STILL HIS TEAM LOST WHEREAS TENDULKAR SCORED 98 AT A LIGHTNING PACE AND WON THAT MATCH FOR INDIA.JUST COMPARE AND U WILL KNOW

2007-05-26 05:18:09 · answer #5 · answered by dighalbank 3 · 1 0

definitely Saeed Anwar is good
if you compare their career till 2000, Sachin made 27 centuries , where 8 of it were against the baby teams, 6 of 27 matches lost
Saeed scored 19 centuries, 2 of it were against baby teams. 2 of 19 matches lost

2015-07-12 21:02:52 · answer #6 · answered by Adil 1 · 0 0

Saeed Anwer is best than sachin saeed he played in any difficult and always winner and played well always against good and expert team and sachin eventhough he record holder but always played against unexperience ,younger team so saeed is always best

2007-05-29 23:01:25 · answer #7 · answered by Shani 4 · 0 0

I think Saeed is truly magnificent and a match winner as you say. Sachin is and always has been a great entertainer, I can't fault him.
Do you disclude Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist, Rahul Dravid, Kevin Pietersen, Jaques Kallis from this discussion?

2007-05-26 00:45:16 · answer #8 · answered by King F 2 · 0 0

Sachin,though down now is still taller than Saeed.

2007-05-29 02:42:02 · answer #9 · answered by Elango 3 · 0 0

Saeed Anwar, he played for the better team!

2007-05-26 10:45:08 · answer #10 · answered by Pakistani 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers