If so, would you pull a John Kerry or Hillary Clinton after 2 years and advocate cut, run, and defeat?
2007-05-25 17:47:29 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ash: So John Kerry and Hillary Clinton were wrong? Awwww come on dont say that!!!!
2007-05-25 18:03:27 · update #1
Frank: Oh I agree, let people like Saddam and Hitler rule the world. Im right with you on that!!
2007-05-25 18:21:52 · update #2
And its a great thing that democrats dont ever take us to war or anything. Where do you get your history from? The back of a rice krispies box?
2007-05-25 18:23:37 · update #3
1) Yes if I thought that we had national interests at stake.
2) No way in Hell.
2007-05-25 18:25:22 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
If the issue is the morally correct, then yes, I supported clinton but he just never did anything of any substance, like stop the OBL group when he had a chance.
do you think clinton will go down in history as the one who let 9/11 happen?
2007-05-26 08:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing conservative about wanting to go to war. War is for the U.S.-Supremecist NeoCons. True conservatives know that meddling in global affairs costs us more in the long run and is not beneficial to our country.
Please - I doubt any tyranical dictator can "rule the world". We can't afford to police the entire world. If anything, we should be in places that really need our help, like Darfur and the Congo. It's alright though, I can tell you're just a neocon and not a real conservative, so not surprising.
2007-05-26 01:10:26 · answer #3 · answered by Frank 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm pretty sure that Clinton would have had the backing of everyone if HE had decided enough was enough with Saddam. Or if HE had decided to go after Osama.
In fact, why didn't he?
2007-05-26 01:35:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If I believed the war was justified in the beginning, then I would want to see it carried out to the end. Surrendering is not an option.
2007-05-26 00:51:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
maybe
no
no to John and Hilarious (not a fun thought)
2007-05-26 01:39:22 · answer #6 · answered by robert p 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would back any president who had valid reasons to go to war legally. I would reevaluate the situation constantly and if demonstrated that our strategy was catastrophic yes I would change it. What's your point? Is it important to win if you are wrong??
2007-05-26 00:51:31 · answer #7 · answered by ash 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋