Libs: If Iran gets nukes, would you back military action?

Question

Or are you done with wars for 30-50 years no matter what happens in the world?

Would you stay in Iran for more than 2 years if the job called for it? Or would you want to cut and run like in Iraq?

FINAL: ROFL

hahahhaha God that wouldnt be funny if it werent so true!!!!

Why are guys bringing up N Korea? That egg that Clinton was sitting on and giving warmth to has already hatched and the dinosaur was running free before the Bush administration had to come along and clean up their mess. Progress has been made on that front however. And to my knowledge, N Korea arent Jihadists or part of Al Queda. PLEASE!

Frank: Pakistan is not a state sponsor of terror, wise up my friend.

Chred: People use cars to do good things. What good things does a nuke do? Especially in the hands of terrorists? Have you libs not seen the threats Iran is making to Israel? If I were Israel right now Id be as nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs!

G: We take what we can get, and dont you libs love talking to people and making friends even if theyre evil? Heck thats the dems speciality! So Osama hiding in a cave somewhere isolated from the world is more of a threat than an entire nation that supports terror and wants nukes? How does that work?

Answer 1

Probably not until nukes hit our own soil, first.

Answer 2

Why would I support attacking a country that hasn't attacked us?

Pakistan developed nukes on their own in secrecy, why didn't we attack it? It's vastly a majority Muslim country, why aren't we worried? Why aren't you calling for us to attack them?

Attacking Iran would be the new worst mistake our country could make. As if we haven't given the Muslim world enough reason to hate us.. If we want them to use their nukes they develop on us, attacking them surely will get them to do so.

Is there nothing wrong with the hypocracy that we (who have more than enough nukes to blow up the entire planet) are telling another country that they can't have them?

There's no cutting and running. Iran is no real threat to us. Sorry, but take your hawkish ambitions of U.S. supremacy somewhere else, or stop sqwakin' and go to Iraq.

edit - Oh, Pakistan isn't a state sponsor of terrorism? Why do most intelligence experts believe Osama Bin Laden is now taking refuge in Pakistan? Iran isn't a "state sponsor" of terrorism, but that's good that you remembered that term from your news media. Radical Islamic sects sponsor terrorism, not the Iranian government. You should try to read some of Ahmadinejad's writings and letters. If there was actually proof of the Iranian government supporting terrorists attacking us, we would be attacking them already.

Answer 3

some sort of action perhaps....

so many are tired of war... I'm afraid Bush truly attacked the wrong country... and the Republicans don't the the political capital to make another full war possible...

but I still find Osama a much larger threat overall... and I would really support an all out effort to bring him in... he has a lot of knowhow and connections that few others seem to have...

and I believe Pakistan about as far as I can throw Rosie... you Republicans are very naive in the Middle East when you make friends... Saudi... and Pakistan? YOWSA...

Answer 4

Its hard to blame the people in Iran who want nukes. - We only attack countries that don't have them and we have already attacked two of Iran's neighbors - We persist in calling Iran part of the Axis of Evil - and we have a president who wants to bring what he calls "Democracy" to the entire middle East.

On the other hand, we haven't attacked Pakistan, which has both Nukes and Islamic extremists.

We are already making enemies faster than we can kill them.
If the U.S. started a war with Iran, we would make many new enemies, and not just in Iran.

Answer 5

I think we need a viable missile defense program to protect against programs such as these, though if they get them it will have already been to late, though I fear Israel will do everything in there power to stop Iran's acqusation of such weapons. Whch could bring on a general war in the middle east, or just another round of meaningless air strikes and rocket attacks.

Answer 6

Well, North Korea has them, and you've see what Bush has done about it . . . nothing.

Pakistan has them, and you see what Bush has done about it . . . given the favored nation status as a partner in the war on terror.

I am, however, a firm believer in the supremacy of the idea that we don't shoot first. If Iran gets a nuke, they can have it. If they LAUNCH it, then not only the USA, but every reasonable nation on EARTH, would join us in making sure they never launch another one.

Here's a concept for you: I'm going to have your local police department send you a speeding ticket. Not because you've been caught speeding, but because I know that your car CAN achieve speeds higher than the law allows. Obviously, since you have the technology to speed, you WILL speed, and since you WILL speed, I might as well go ahead and punish you for it now, right?

Same concept, different scale.

Answer 7

I hope all the countries get nukes. Once you get a nuke you dont get preemptively struck. You get respect with the bomb. Sorry if you dont sleep well at night because of a million thoughts of people wanting to nuke you but I do just fine.

Answer 8

Here's a better question for you: "If" Iraq had WMD's, and "IF" Iraq was an imminent threat to the U.S., and "IF" Iraq had been involved in 9-11, would Liberals back military action. Answer: of course. Unfortunately there was no "IF's". None of it was true.

Another question might be "IF" Bush told me Iran had nukes, would I believe him. Answer NO. Fool me once.....

Answer 9

The current administration has demonstrated that we only attack nations that don't have any nukes. This is a non issue.

Answer 10

No I wouldn't because Iran would use the nukes if we invaded.

Answer 11

Of course they wouldn't... we would have to be attacked by one of those nukes before they would even consider going to war with Iran.... upon finding out they had nukes, they would justify it by saying, "they have the right to protect their nation like we do..." (they haven't caught onto the fact that we haven't promised to use ours the second we get them or promised to rid the world of a group of people), although libs are in line with that... they would love to get rid of conservatives..

Anyhow... once we got hit... they would sit around and wonder if they could just talk to them and find out how to appease them... maybe they wouldn't do it again...

OK... I can't stand it... to depressing to go on.... I can only play the liberal mindset for so long before my brain screams in agony....