English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you don't believe me check out www.aim.org

It stands for accuracy in media . org

the article title is - Top Hillary Campaign Contributor has Terrorist Connection

I was shocked. I won't be voting for her now.

2007-05-25 16:05:47 · 19 answers · asked by h m 2 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

aim gets is data from the election commission reports hillary occasionally files, another of her crimes, not reporting on time or correctly.

so for you doubters, it is a fact.

now why is this not on the news? are they afraid of clinton, or do they actively support her by not reporting this crime.

If you deny fact, you have a problem, these are facts, she is taking money from people with KNOWN LINKS TO TERRORISTS

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/allsummary.asp?CID=N00000019

2007-05-26 01:57:19 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1 1

A) Just because an organization has "Accuracy" in its name doesn't mean its accurate

B) Calling Hani Masri someone with ties to terrorist organizations is stretching things. He is a Palestinian leader, and, as such, he worked with Arafat. It would be hard to be a long-time Palestinian leader without working with Arafat. He also worked with Shimon Peres. There is no suggestion anywhere that he actually was involved with any terrorist activities. Whatever your thoughts on the Palestinian situation, you surely must acknowledge that there are people working for their cause who are not terrorists, and who are opposed to terrorism (Not enough, sadly, but they are there). The article, and your question, is an obvious attempt to smear someone despite the facts. But since you're preaching to the choir, what's the point? Nobody with any sense is going to buy it, and the people who think you're telling the truth already agree with you.

2007-05-26 00:06:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Actually that website is a piece of crap and likes to make up facts. They reference an article here:http://www.observer.com/2007/hillary-s-peace-seeking-palestinian-fund-raiser in support of their claim that Mr. Masri has ties to terrorists and the article says nothing of the sort.

If you want to make the claim that anybody with a Palestinian heritage is a terrorist then you should come right and say that.


"I was shocked. I won't be voting for her now."

Who are you kidding, you would not be voting for her no matter what.

2007-05-25 23:17:40 · answer #3 · answered by beren 7 · 2 1

www.aim.org is only named 'accuracy in the Media".
It really isn't. If you do some research, you find out it is a neocon hit group.

I'm sure snopes.com will debunk the Hillary/terrorist connection any time.

2007-05-25 23:12:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

The American Museum Council? Subterfuge? Naw, bad spell checker. lmao

2007-05-25 23:18:23 · answer #5 · answered by Wonka 5 · 1 0

I would think her philosophy and lack of achievement would be reason enough not to vote for her.

2007-05-26 00:12:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So a Palestinian business man qualifies as a "terrorist"? So all Palestinians are terrorists?!

2007-05-26 00:09:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Maybe that's why she was one of a very few who voted "No" on funding the troops. Obama is another. (I knew there were good reasons why I wasn't going to vote for either of them.)

2007-05-25 23:19:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I heard she gets mega bucks from Israel and Rupert Murdoch. They certainly qualify as terrorist organizations.

Watson, I think you are on to something.

2007-05-25 23:29:31 · answer #9 · answered by andy r 3 · 0 3

lol!!, I been reading through that website, biggest laugh I've had all day, it makes fox news look a quarter of the way factual, and thats saying alot.

2007-05-25 23:11:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers