Yes. Send the government leaders into battle.
In truth, only governments declare war, but their people --who don't want war-- is made to fight.
If all the soldiers of the world got together and decided not to fight, wars would very few and far in between.
2007-05-25 14:21:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I love that question. Generals use to lead his men into battle now they sit in the white house drinking wine and being waited on. I think either them or their sons.
2007-05-25 19:58:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Vanessa 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh of course there would be less war! It's that rule, "easier said than done."
2007-05-25 19:58:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by lafemelle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No cause then we'd be even worse off after Bush got killed and Chaney would be president.
2007-05-25 19:58:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Killer Karamazing 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Three months? They would be dead in three months....they are too soft from desk-sitting. How bout 1 month and then I say GO FOR IT!
2007-05-25 19:59:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by missellie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
YES-ER-EE! Good Point and I do agree I00%!! Let them Join our "SITTING DUCKS" and Dodge Some Bullits!! It really makes me sick because "they " are so Stubborn AND Hard-headed! You know who "THEY" IS>
2007-05-25 21:10:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by minnetta c 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
outstanding question. have a star. yes, unrealistic as the scenario is, that would be fantastic. if we can't send bushdick, we could send his fat, alcoholic sl*t daughters. that would ROCK!
2007-05-25 20:00:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell yea it should be a requirement
2007-05-25 19:59:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey, I'm all for it...
2007-05-25 19:57:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by knight2001us 6
·
1⤊
0⤋