2007-05-25 10:57:06 · 21 answers · asked by ColoradoBrew 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Let me give you a hint. The Air Force is already cutting thousands of people because the Democrats won't fund them. They're flying 40-50 year old airplanes which are death traps, but your democrats in congress won't replace them, even though they're so old that it would be cheaper to buy new then to fix the old airplanes. The cargo workhorse, the C-130, is so archaic that in 4 years the Europeans won't even let them through their airspace.
2007-05-25 11:02:09 · answer #1 · answered by John 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hillary's high on national security. She's itching to truly address the war on terror instead of policing a civil war, and that includes here at home. Here is an excerpt of her thoughts on Homeland Security:
Q: How has this label come that the Republicans will protect America best?
A: I have worked very hard to try to convince the administration to do those things that would make us safer. And I think there's a big disconnect between the rhetoric and the reality. We haven't secured our borders, our ports, our mass transit systems. You can go across this country and see so much that has not been done. The resources haven't gotten to the front lines where decisions are made in local government the way that they need to. And I think that this administration has consistently tried to hype the fear without delivering on the promise of making America safer. And its foreign policy around the world has also made the world less stable, which, of course, has a ripple effect with respect to what we're going to face in the future. So I hope that we can put that myth to rest. It is certainly something I will try to do during the campaign.
Source: South Carolina 2007 Democratic primary debate, on MSNBC Apr 26, 2007
EDIT: I am amused every day by the cons who answer these questions about Hillary with stupid rhetoric and assumptions. They actually know NOTHING about where she stands on national security and just load up the b.s. so they can get off an insult at her expense. Are they really all that stupid and uninformed? Disturbing.
2007-05-25 19:15:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
It is not about what we think about a woman President...but more importantly...given the current terrorist concerns...what the Arabic world would think about a woman President. Remember they regard women as beneath them...and would never take orders from one. Consider the nature of their religion...and what value and role a woman has within their mind. Now extend that to what they would think about a nation that would elect a woman to command their armies.
Then ask yourself...how secure are we?
2007-05-25 18:07:56 · answer #3 · answered by Amovitas 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Mickey Mouse Club!
2007-05-25 18:10:53 · answer #4 · answered by Heidi 4 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Like Forrest Gump on ridlin
2007-05-25 19:06:18 · answer #5 · answered by tap158 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Considering the fact that Bill Clinton had a clear shot at Osama Bin Ladin and was going to kill him, but the right wing Haters lead by Ken Starr attacked him it is safe to say that America will be safer. Hillary will get bin Ladin and any other terrorist before they attack us. America will be safer with Clinton so support her. It just makes sense.
2007-05-25 18:53:48 · answer #6 · answered by Monte B 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Only Dyke's would be in Bill Clinton's Security Detail.
2007-05-25 18:00:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well, she would increase the size of homeland security. No, wait, decrease the size of homeland security...I mean, maybe we could leave it creased.
2007-05-25 18:40:27 · answer #8 · answered by Chief Yellow Horse 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Better than we have now. She could put John Boener in charge of it and he can cry his way into the office.
2007-05-25 18:57:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
We will all die. The mexicans will take over america. Canada will become the ultimate world power!
2007-05-25 18:00:58 · answer #10 · answered by Veritas et Aequitas () 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋