quoting today...
Clinton argued that she backs U.S. troops but it was time to stand firm as the four-year-old war rages on.
Obama today quoting...
So let's put aside the fear mongering and let's put aside the rhetoric and let's put aside the politics and let's come together and ... all of us support the troops," Obama told a labor gathering in Chicago as he called for bringing the troops home
................................BUT...........................................
Obama and Clinton last week...
A week ago, Clinton and Obama voted to advance a measure that would cut off funding to force a troop withdrawal by March 2008
Obama and Billary last year...
Last year, the two voted against setting a timetable for a pullout, and until recently had avoided any notion of eliminating war money.
This is holding firm and supporting our troops as we come together??? which one is it and why issue marching orders to the Pelosi ites to vote FOR the funding? Only with liberals
2007-05-25 10:46:36 · 11 answers · asked by koalatcomics 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
liberals just dont get it....HELLLOOOOOO ANYONE HOME??? SUPPORTING OUR TROOPS DOES NOT INVOLVE DECLARING RETREAT AND CUTTING OFF FUNDING OK....ITS NAKED RAW COWARDICE.
2007-05-25 11:11:50 · update #1
It's a gamble. They want to see which choice will be the most popular in order to get the nomination and eventually the vote. Most of them voted for the invasion and now they're pointing fingers at one person. They want to go the way of mob rules and we all know how smart a mob is. So did the Nobles during the French Revolution.
2007-05-25 10:51:50 · answer #1 · answered by madbaldscotsman 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes.. The best support we can give our troops is to get them home. If its democracy we are fighting for, lets the Iraqis vote to end the US occupation.
Listening to the Republican debates.. its clear that 9 out of 10 of them have no idea why 9/11 happened.
Ron Paul does.
The wacko right wing is all for killing our enemys without having a clue on just who are enemys are.
2007-05-26 13:29:21 · answer #2 · answered by Arthur F 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both are an embarassment to this country, their own party does not want them. The problem is the Dems think that the only way into the WH is with one of these two.
Lets face it an angry communist b**ch and a pacificst moslem ni***r are not the future of America
2007-05-25 18:01:12 · answer #3 · answered by fade_2_black 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the Dims want to have it both ways, getting credit for supporting the troops, but not the blame because this war is hard(it's the easiest war we've had)
2007-05-25 17:52:03 · answer #4 · answered by kapute2 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
When you yourself are unsure of your political position....it will always sound like double talk...its like trying to keep a lie straight...the more you lie, the more confused about the truth you become.....
2007-05-25 18:17:26 · answer #5 · answered by Lilliput1212 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which way the wind blows , its OK neither one will occupy the White House.
2007-05-25 17:49:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I don't speak gibberish. Don't be so0 hard on them. New polls are always being released. It must be hard to keep track of what every poll tells you to say.
2007-05-25 17:53:06 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Support the troops, bring em home! What do americans not get?
2007-05-25 17:50:16 · answer #8 · answered by jeb black 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Obama doesn't even know how to spell. "Flak" Jacket not "Flack" Jacket. It must be that small brain.
2007-05-25 18:39:26 · answer #9 · answered by count_bongula666 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
if you waist your time on trying to figure out a lie, all you do is go in circles.
2007-05-25 17:51:36 · answer #10 · answered by AFIN 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋