I better brace myself.
2007-05-25 07:29:49 · 34 answers · asked by newray777 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Against Kucinich, Edwards, Obama, or Hillary?
Yes.
Bill Richardson is the only Dem in the current crop of contenders that has any chance in hell of winning.
2007-05-25 07:32:47 · answer #1 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 4⤊ 8⤋
Anybody who would vote for Bush now has to be an unbelievable moron. I can see voting for him in 2000 (if you were a Republican), as he was a relative unknown and riding Big Daddy's name. Even in 2004, because his opponent was so weak.
Half of the Republicans polled now think he's doing a bad job, as does more than 70% of Americans (even using Fox's numbers). I don't think Bush could get 20% of the vote right now.
2007-05-25 10:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by psatm 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What do you mean IF it was legal? The Supreme Dictators will probably MAKE it legal ! And no, I won't vote at all in 2008 because the Supreme Dictators will just get involved again and re-appoint Bush !
2007-05-25 07:55:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO!! I couldn't stand another 4 years of his lies and corruption.
And to those people who say "I'd vote for him, they voted him in twice" have you checked his approval ratings recently? His current ratings are 27% of the people like the job Bush is doing. So if an election was held right now to give Bush another term he would lose by a landslide.
I would never vote for him, he would just keep us in Iraq for 4 MORE years and probably lead us into another war.
2007-05-25 08:50:59 · answer #4 · answered by Jim S 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
your right you better brace your self.
do you really think any one in there right mind would ever let him back in the white house? NO! maybe the die hard Conservatives would try buy voting for him but 10or 20 votes won't make it thank god he is almost out of there.
2007-05-25 08:19:32 · answer #5 · answered by sandyjean 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, I never voted for him before, I am not willing to change now.
I really believe that even if it was legal then Bush would not even receive the nomination. Because of the issues he has caused i truly believe that another Republican candidate would be nominated before him.
Even having said that, I may be hoping as when Bush was nominated before I though McCain was a significantly better candidate.
2007-05-25 07:39:20 · answer #6 · answered by arimarismacon 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
I would write in a candidate rather than vote for Bush -- I am never voting for Hillbillary
2007-05-25 08:00:25 · answer #7 · answered by Dionysus 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No because he would have zero chance in the republican primary.... but against hillary and obama you bet your *** I would.... if they won and cut and run in Iraq their would be grave consequences (I'm not saying I agree with the war).... not to mention I don't want to pay higher taxes and move toward a socialistic society
2007-05-25 08:32:00 · answer #8 · answered by pokeskickazzzz 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush has turned out to be liberal in disguise. He's a free spending, illegal immigant loving, one worlder of the highest order. As a self respecting conservative, absolutely not, I could not vote for him again.
2007-05-25 07:37:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
HELL NO!!! He has done NOTHING good for us since he's been elected. I heard that there was a paper that he didn't sign to help us w/ global warming. It took him forever to help the people during Katrina. He is a selfish little boy who wants to be like his daddy. (who I think is also worthless)
2007-05-25 09:03:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
i never voted for Bush and I don't like him. But if it were Bush v Hillary I would vote for Bush. He's been dealing with the war, I'd like to see him finish it. I don't know what his plan is, but I'm sure he has one somehwere.
2007-05-25 07:34:34 · answer #11 · answered by Diggy 5 · 6⤊ 4⤋