Terminator 4: Life in the bunker?

Question

I know everyone wants the war to happen, even me! But why not keep terminator running on disel for just a little longer, i thought this:

T4 - Life in the bunker

John conner and Kate have had a Young son, 3 Terminators are sent through time, 2 T-800 endoskeletons (Coverd in flesh) and a t-1000 Played by Robert patrick. This time the t-1000 is 23year old Johns protecter, the machines appear in the bunker and they try and kill john, The t1000 uses whatever weapons it can find inside the bunker, bla bla bla.

What do you think? Do you think this would make a good sequal or shall we leap 25 years into Death itself? You decide, looks like we have a little debate coming on =D

Answer 1

I think the Terminator novelty has worn off. The first was great (I always watch it when it is back on cable) and it has been downhill rapidly after that one.

Let those terminators rest. There are too many desperate sequels of all the movies coming from Hollywood.

Answer 2

i like to envision human beings's solutions.. supplies me a stable snigger in the morning while im drained. there'll be 3 extra terminator video clips, in a trilogy on the subject of the conflict sooner or later. And, it wont be approximately Kyle Reese the two all nevertheless im helpful he will play a evaluate it someplace. just to make it easier to comprehend, I certainly have been following this plan because of the fact that before T3 got here out and that they pronounced it replaced into gonna have a sequel to persist with it. As for Arnold, we could sparkling some thing up as quickly as and for all. Arnold isnt needed in the 1st action picture. reason: The putting of area 4 is before Terminator type robots are created through the machines. whether there is an threat of a Arnold cameo in 5 or 6 yet that's no longer definate.. yet. the story line for the area 4 is notably basic so some distance. Marcus (solid unknown) wakes up 15 years after the nuclear conflict to stand the hot international. Christian Bale would be enjoying John Connor yet for as quickly as he won't be the focal factor. he would be enjoying extra of a costar place. Sorry to disapoint you with out Arnold yet thats purely no longer area of the story line for area 4

Answer 3

Ok, I don't wanna rain on your parade, but we're not getting a lead part out of Ahnold until he's not the Govuhnuh anymore. Other than that it sounds like fun, but I think maybe we should just stick to the war of the machines. That might make for a better closing. I had heard the Rock would be working on the next Terminator, and that makes me a sad panda.

Answer 4

NO THANKS


are you nuts.


thats the stupidest story line ive ever heard


no they need to stick with plan A for T4 (the storyline created as T3 came out)

the future and the war between the machines and humanity..

No terminators needed.

Answer 5

What more can you tell of the story? That's what I want to know. I mean James Cameron is no longer involved with this new project just he had no involvement in T-3, which I thought was the worst of the original trilogy. I guess we'll have to wait and see what the new film holds in store.

Answer 6

yer and there doing 5 and 6 and thinking of a series 2 way go t4 lol

Answer 7

If you really are interested in whats going to happen in T4 check this out
http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/02/28/arnold-schwarzenegger-to-return-for-terminator-4/

Answer 8

I think if you go into a part 4 of a film you may be ruining a great trilogy.

Answer 9

I'm sad enough to watch it. Get that screenplay written Dude.

Answer 10

I think we already jumped 25 years, this movie's DEAD!