This has been asked many times before, a similar one only 21 hours ago, and I have asked this before. This time, I would just like a simple answer of three choices - "Circumcised", "Uncircumcised", or "Really don't care at all". And the most important thing, is to state your LOCATION. I'd really like to see if it is the US girls that prefer the circumcised, and UK girls that prefer uncircumcised, or don't care. Any other info. like age/experience that you would be prepared to offer would be great. for the record, I am English, in my 30s and circumcised at birth. Thanks!
2007-05-24 23:48:58 · 21 answers · asked by Paul B 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
People are saying health reasons.
Hahahaha! What health reasons?
Forced circumcision is wrong.
Circumcision is a form of male genital mutilation. It is generally the forced removal of the foreskin from a child without the ability of the child to consent.
The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and therefore very significant during sexual intercourse. The foreskin reduces the force required by the penis to enter the vagina. It also increases the sexual enjoyment of the female partner. Here is a study to back this up: http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/
Performing circumcision on a child can and does result in the deaths of children due to blood loss and/or failure of the immune system.
It can and does result in very significant scaring.
It can and does result in sexual problems later in life.
The idea that it provides better hygeine is flawed and is simply a matter of performing good genital hygeine. The study that you are less succeptible to aids if you are circumcised is flawed(see link: http://www.cirp.org/news/sydneymorningherald11-06-03/ ).
Do not do it for hygeine issues. It is a trivial task to ensure good genital hygeine. The majority of the world is uncircumcised and they do just fine.
The vast majority of Europe is uncircumcised and Islam prohibits the practice.
"Islamic juridical logic cannot acknowledge the distinction between female and male circumcision, both being the mutilation of healthy organs which is damaging to the physical integrity of the child, whatever the underlying religious motivations. Furthermore, both practices violate the Koran: "Our Lord, You did not create all this in vain" (3:191), and "[He] perfected everything He created" (32:7). In our opinion, a god who demands that his believers be mutilated and branded on their genitals the same as cattle, is a god of questionable ethics." [ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7731348&dopt=Abstract ]
There is no good reason to perform male genital mutilation.
Leave your child decide what he wants when he is old enough to decide himself.
Have a look at some of these websites:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9712/23/circumcision.anesthetic/
2007-05-25 02:03:37 · answer #1 · answered by Nidav llir 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
To be perfectly honest, I prefer circumcised. I have been involved with a guy with an uncircumcised penis and it really freaked me out. The thought of him not cleaning it properly and etc made me extra freaked out so after that I never dated any guy with an uncircumcised penis.I am a 21 year old from Th States
2007-05-27 13:00:51 · answer #2 · answered by charlie 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It doesn't really matter, it more about the person the appendage is connected to!
I have only experienced one uncircumsized one, I found it hard to get to grips with if you excuse the pun as I am used to something a little more to move around there and I was scared of hurting the guy or making him sore. But after a bit of practice, I got used to it.
I am 28 and live in the UK. The guy in question was 36.
2007-05-24 23:53:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Circumcised. From UK.
2007-05-25 01:40:13 · answer #4 · answered by lorna b 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Circumcised
English female in my early 30s
My own experience of both . Circumcised men tend to be more hygienic and less prone to infections . Non circumcised men easier to give hand relief to but not as hygienic and more prone to infection.
Can't really say I mind either way it's how good they use it that I mind more about. ;)
I don't think circumcisions should be done for any other reasons other then if it is medically needed to be preformed .
2007-05-24 23:53:37 · answer #5 · answered by scorpionbabe32 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I prefer whatever a man is more comfortable with. it really makes no difference.
I had my oldest son circumcised and it hurt him so much (I don't care that he'll never remember it) that I vowed to never have another son circumcised. and that's what I did. I have another son now and he's still intact. ;-) my husband is NOT circumcised btw. I really can't tell a difference physically if that's what you are asking. i'm USA btw. my husband is from new zealand.
2007-05-24 23:54:55 · answer #6 · answered by reeree 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Really dont care - UK
had experience with both, only difference is circumcised blokes didnt seem as sensitive.
2007-05-24 23:56:20 · answer #7 · answered by Toogsie 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm from the US, and I prefer CIRCUMCISED. I totally hate to say it, but uncircumcised ones kinda weird me.
2007-05-25 01:24:50 · answer #8 · answered by queen tj 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Circumcised is cleaner and more slightly more preferable but I would have to say that I really don't care, It doesn't make a huge difference either way really!
:-)
p.s i'm a UK girlie!
2007-05-24 23:53:21 · answer #9 · answered by jemski 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Circumcised definetly, it's cleaner. I'm 20 and I'm in AZ. I'm not a **** but I do have a lot of experience. I worked in a porn shop for the longest time and I got a lot of those questions.
2007-05-24 23:52:05 · answer #10 · answered by kornflake06 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋