By a wide margin, the news media concentrated on Democratic presidential contenders more than Republicans during the first three months of 2007, according to a study issued on Thursday
Campaign stories in newspapers, on television, online and on the radio focused on Democrats 61 percent of the time and on Republicans 24 percent...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070524/ap_on_en_tv/tv_campaign_coverage_1
2007-05-24 13:18:03 · 4 answers · asked by Tired o 3 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
wx2b, I submitted the link, you can check the source accordingly.
Also, check out this expose on CNN: http://youtube.com/watch?v=hFXgpG0R83U
2007-05-24 15:56:03 · update #1
You're back! Yes, and the next question is will they police themselves?
2007-05-25 09:17:03 · answer #1 · answered by Big D 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's tough to know the validity of such studies when the sources aren't considered.
In this case, Obama and Clinton certainly rank as the major curiosities of the race, since both would make history if they received the nomination. In this early stage of the race, that sounds like it could tilt the total coverage toward the Democrats.
And it is interesting that the conservative hosts are spending more time on the Democrats.
2007-05-24 15:32:17 · answer #2 · answered by wdx2bb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its like dropping an elephant on a fruit scale. We in basic terms cant degree the favortism the democrats get. If we printed out each and each of the loose passes they get, we would might want to element each and each of the timber in this hemisphere! you recognize, hemisphere is a surprising be conscious. It in basic terms doesnt get used adequate!
2016-11-27 00:38:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well my friend, you answered your own question quite well. talk radio is so popular amonst gopers bc its really the only source to get the straight dope. plus im not into gloom and doom in the usual press
2007-05-24 13:29:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋