i have no idea, but if jesus was married who cares?but it would be intresting to find out.however someone brought two intresting points to my attention , one was in revelation it talks about a women with a cup , and a women of sinful things .also another person pointed out , maby all this about the supposive mary magdeline could be his mother , this person had a point why wouldnt his mother be at his left side ?another book that is out , its suposed to be about his mother mary , how she had preformed miracles also.
i do have a question on this though has anyone ever found jesus's mothers body , maby i missed that one.
another point , if you read in the bible after the last supper jesus goes off to pray alone , asking for his blood to be passed on , now maby that means he is praying for mary to become pregnate???why would someone want there real blood to be passed , just a thought
2007-05-24 12:48:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by delana 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well the davinci code could very possibly be true there is the priory of scion and the nights templar. but thats assuming that jesus christ actually existed. i mean think about it there is no body. no dna. no documents supporting his earthly visit untill years even hundreds of years after he was supposed dead.nobody wrote about him while he was here and he didnt write anything. so to be honest with u i believe hes a myth. so it cant be true unless he was real then it can be because in the bible it says if a man and a woman love each other they can marry and have kids and what was jesus he was a man correct? so its plausable and its not.
2007-05-24 12:45:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jay 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is zero truth to the DaVinci Code. Dan Brown wrote fiction.
2007-05-24 12:38:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. A 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no truth what so ever about the Davinci Code
2007-05-24 13:11:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by kilroymaster 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Though it was a good story, it was still FICTION I repeat fiction. There are tons of books involving myths and legends. Many of the things in the book did actually exist, however it is impossible to know what really happened unless you know someone 2000 years old.
2007-05-24 15:55:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by xx. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
In the beginning of the book, Dan Brown clearly points out that the book has absolutely nothing to do with reality; a complete work of fiction.
2007-05-24 12:46:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by PDAisAOK 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some factual elements in DVC. Dan Brown did some research, and some guesswork. The majority of opinions regarding this book, are derived from those, who BEFORE the DVC, had never researched the subject, and STILL have not !
2007-05-24 12:48:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ED SNOW 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was written as a fiction the plot is not intended to be true, but the Knights Templar and Priory Scion stuff included was very historically acurate, nobody knows what (or where)the "grail" was or is
2007-05-24 12:46:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by TuesdayStar 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Parts of the movie are true. Parts are fiction. And some parts are either a combination of both or just a "rumor"
Take a look at these websites to help you further understand which parts are indeed fact and which are fiction...
http://www.danbrown.com/novels/davinci_code/faqs.html
http://www.lisashea.com/hobbies/art/
2007-05-24 12:39:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by cazdudet 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. that's a artwork of fiction. Indiana Jones did no longer discover the Ark of the Covenant, Monty Python did no longer discover the Holy Grail, and The bones of Mary Magdalene are not buried under the friggin' Louvre.
2016-11-05 07:21:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋