I need three arguements if I'm against it or for it. But I don't really care so I don't know what to talk about.
2007-05-24 12:31:37 · 5 answers · asked by georgmor 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Someone that knows is Libertarian Kelley L Ross PhD
2007-05-24 12:38:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Against:
1. It's harmful. If it wasn't, there wouldn't be any laws against it in the first place. The federal government always knows best.
2. It will be abused by .... well, everyone who can find a way. Just look at the number of people who abuse it now even though it's illegal.
3. It doesn't really help terminally ill patients, it just distracts them. They have a right to experience the pain of knowing they are about to die.
For:
1. It alleviates suffering.
2. If a patient is terminal, we might as well make it legal since they'd never get through the logjam of cases to ever be tried anyway.
3. What business is it of yours what other people smoke?
2007-05-24 19:42:41 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am against it. You may have some responsible patients out there who respect the drug but the majority of this country are morons who will abuse the drug and become addicted to it and will be added to the ever growing list of addicts.
2007-05-24 19:49:35 · answer #3 · answered by dransom90 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. good for chronic pain
2. helps aids patients that are waisting
3. good for glaucoma
2007-05-24 19:46:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do your own homework. There are many sites that deal with this very topic.
2007-05-24 19:34:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋