2007-05-24 12:18:06 · 14 answers · asked by BeautifulDevil 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
My personal belief is that both evolution and creation has occurred in our world. Specifically, I believe that God used the methods of the Big Bang Theory and Evolution to create and populate the world. The scientific definition of this belief is Theistic Evolution, which states that an intelligent creator started the process, but has not played a significant role in the process since the initial event.
2007-05-24 12:30:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think that it's foolish to be blind to either theory. Of course there is evidence proving that to some extent evolution has occured. But why is it that those who believe so strongly in evolution are so quick to dismiss the possibility of creation?
It COULD be that they are in fact BOTH responsible for the creation of the world as we know it. But the most difficult part for most is having the faith to believe that a higher power was involved in both the Creation, and Evolution of life.
2007-05-24 13:34:18 · answer #2 · answered by Thomas E 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Evolution is supported by what we know and observe. Creation is "supported" by the fact that there are some things we don't understand yet, and in general, lack of information.
Both are possible. But I have yet to hear a well-informed argument for creation.
2007-05-24 12:28:10 · answer #3 · answered by Master Maverick 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
IF humans evolved then the evolution was random. Why if evolution is random did we all come out the SAME? If one painting is the same as another painting would you not agree they were created by the same artist?
How then was man created ALL the same if evolution is random?
2007-05-29 16:21:59 · answer #4 · answered by Ninja Showdown 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evolution has been demonstrated by DNA as well as fossil evidence. If there is any creation, it utilizes evolution.
2007-05-24 12:21:32 · answer #5 · answered by JimZ 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
on the subject of the communicate happening approximately clever layout and evolution: is it attainable that the stunning answer approximately which of those 2 probably opposite recommendations is right might desire to easily be confident? With one place firmly held through the believers and the different purely as fearlessly defended through the non-believers, for people who be able someplace close to the middle, it does not look all that complicated. From this place, you ask your self why the two-or must be the respond. in case you think that some greater being created the universe through clever layout, what extra stylish and clever layout might desire to there have been than a self-regulating gadget that continuously tests its very own blunders and makes its very own corrections in mid-pass as an crucial area of the technique. This all looks extremely logical to me whether it probable gained’t fulfill the believers because of the fact they are afraid to be certain any actuality different than the single they have been informed to have self assurance in. Inversely it truthfully gained’t fulfill the non-believers because of the fact it leaves them caught with a god that they are so needless to say afraid of. To sum up this view from the middle, it would desire to be maximum purely be defined through asserting perhaps the clothier replaced into clever. subject is, the clothier replaced into probable so clever that those attempting to show that that's intelligently designed may well be incapable of ever comprehend it properly sufficient to be certain it for the stylish self regulating layout that it has continuously been. The nonbelievers would be in addition handicapped because of the indoors terror the have on the subject of the thought that there may well be a God. Neither edge having the flexibility to pass away their entrenched place for concern they might might desire to admit they have been incorrect. on an identical time as something human beings stand through attempting to be certain what all the fuss is approximately. for my area I don’t think of all and sundry is misguided, I purely sense the two aspects are approximately 0.5 suited. Love and reward don
2016-11-05 07:20:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is science, creationism is a fable.
2007-05-24 12:25:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
shouldn't be evolution vs creation, there is evolution, there may or may not be creation
2007-05-24 12:23:38 · answer #8 · answered by Nick F 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Creationists believe all things were created by a supreme being, i.e., God.
Evolutionists believe there are many supreme beings, all of whom are themselves and fellow evolutionists.
I believe in evolution, but I find the attitudes of many evolutionists to be repugnant. They pray to their god of science, but their primary goal seems to be to disparage creationists and their beliefs.
My belief in evolution is based on a statement allegedly made by Mark Twain: "Man descended from the apes....and is still descending!"
How many evolutionists did he know?
2007-05-29 11:54:12 · answer #9 · answered by SCOTT M 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i accept that evolution happened, is happening, and will continue to happen. there is no basis for creationism
2007-05-28 18:07:36 · answer #10 · answered by The Tourist 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋