So, if Clinton should have done more about Bin Laden towards the end of his term, then...?

Question

A) Shouldn't those republican congressman have gotten off of Clinton's case about his personal (not even political) affairs to let him do his duties?

B) Shouldn't Bush have done more during the beginning of his term about Bin Laden and definitely not gone on his record-long vacation in August?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/august01/2001-08-03-bush-vacation.htm

Answer 1

all of the above.

edit. just a reminder for some. in Americas judicial system,you are guilty until you prove yourself innocent. i know it wasn't set up that way,but it has became that way

Answer 2

The problem runs much deeper then just Bin Laden. If Clinton did more then he would be in the same boat Bush is in now. If Bush did less then the Islaminc Extremists would still come out of the woodwork and do exactly what they are doing now. This is an issue that all nations should have taken seriously. It is not about Bin Laden! It is not Sadam or WMD's. It is our economy and way of life. We have been considered the access of evil by countries who detest our freedom and abundance long before Bin Laden led the Taliban and when they were considered a worthy group of freedom fighters and not terrorists. Now look how they evolved. They evolved into an extremely large group of terrorists, in place all over the world who want to cripple all free societies and beyond. It is not Clinton's fault and it is not Bush's fault. It is the fault of our world leaders who aloud this shame to creep up on them so slowly becuse they wanted America to foot the bill all the way down the line. America stands alone because of the greed of other nations. How simple to put WW111 on the shoulders of two men.

Answer 3

WOLF, you are one of the most ignorant people on the Yahoo forums. Either that, or the most uninformed person here. You're saying Clinton wanted to be Bin Ladens pal? But Bush and all his families ties to the Bin Laden family via the Saudi Bin Laden Group mean nothing? You are an idiot if you actually believe that. Go figure, you still support the president.

Answer 4

Clinton wanted to be popular. Pants down he let the fly loose time and time again. All on Hillary's watch.
A. President Clinton was asked twice b4 it was made public
to answer questions in a sexual harrassment suit and he lied twice. So, as a lawyer, he broke the law he swore to serve let alone President protect.
B. Do you think a President really goes on vacation? Get a life ,they bring the office home. Now Clinton's Hawaiian vacations were a pain in the asp as a resident there he ate and drank and golfed his way all over our island.
***James B I think I am in love ***

Answer 5

President Clinton did exactly what he needed to.
Yes, the seditious attacks on President Clinton should have been faced down by every patriotic American in the country.

President Bush is doing exactly what he needs to.
The seditious attacks on President Bush should be faced down by every patriotic American in the county.

Good men, doing what they believe is best for the country and having a WHOLE LOT MORE information than the seditious undermining vermin have as they attack our Presidents with name-calling, unproven rumors, and treating them as "guilty until proven innocent".

It's contemptible.