Remember, Rex could improve but this might hurt Vick, but you also have to remember that it's possible that nothing will happen to Vick and Rex could have like 25 td's and 20 int's again.
2007-05-24 10:27:14 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Vick might be able to run ( he doesn't pass very often, and that can hurt) , but if thats what the Falcons wanted, they should've took L.T., at least the Bears took someone who can throw to a receiver ( whenever Rex is focused and wants to win). He's also shown that he's decent ( having 7 games with over 100 passer rating, and having 5 games where it was under 40.0)
2007-05-24 15:32:48 · update #1
Rex. He did take them to the superbowl. Vick has never made it past the conference finals.
2007-05-24 10:35:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Without a doubt, Vick.
Sure he's not the most accurate passer, but he's far more accurate that Grossman. Plus he's mobile.
Think about it, Vick had a better year that Grossman and Rex actually had recievers that could catch his off target passes. Vick's recievers dropped passed even if they where right between the numbers. His only worthwile reciever was Alge Crumpler...a tight end.
As a matter of fact, expect Chris Leak ot give Rex a run for the starting job. Mabye not this year...but in a year mabye two there'll be a QB controversey in Chicago.
2007-05-24 10:44:41 · answer #2 · answered by Uchitoru 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Michael Vick. All Grossman has to do is limit his turnovers and hand the ball off. He doesn't need to go out and put up big numbers for his team to win because of the Bears D. Falcons on the other hand don't have a great D and Vick is forced to be able to score a lot.
2007-05-24 12:47:23 · answer #3 · answered by pn1125 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Vick has more potential to be great than any other player in the NFL. That being said he is probably also the most overrated player in the NFL.
Still, Rex Grossman would only be a starter for maybe 2-3 teams in the NFL, where Vick would be a starter for at least half. It is Vick, no question.
2007-05-24 10:40:03 · answer #4 · answered by Brandon M 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I know Rex Grossman is not consistent and he isn't that good of a QB, but give him credit he did some thing Vick hasn't he led his Bears to the Superbowl. Another reason I'd take Rex over Vick is because Rex doesn't beat dogs and make them fight each other like Vick has done. Yes they haven't fully proved it, but they have plenty of proof to convince me.
2007-05-24 10:49:51 · answer #5 · answered by soccerari6595 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rex Grossman at least He got Approval from his Coach Lovie Smith, Vick's Current Coach Bob Petrino thinks he's a Loose Cannon.
2007-05-24 11:30:13 · answer #6 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Vick no doubt. If you look at it my way, Mike Vick had more under pressure games than Rex. Another thing, i would rather have a scrambling quarterback than a pocket passer. If Rex Grossman was a lil more accurate and more faster, then i would have chose him.
2007-05-24 10:34:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Vick hands down. Even with all his "problems" he's still a GREAT quarterback. Speed quickness and a developing a arm for accuracy mike Vick is far better than Rex
2007-05-24 13:02:18 · answer #8 · answered by wonka288 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vick is a better player, but his act is getting old.
Everybody gives Grossman grief, but he has played in just as many Super Bowls as Donovan McNabb, Boomer Esiason and Dan Marino and more than Randall Cunningham, Michael Vick or Warren Moon.
2007-05-24 13:34:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Vick
2007-05-24 10:47:39 · answer #10 · answered by RICHARD M 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd rather have Michael Vick. Neither of these guys are good QBs but you could convert Vick into a slot WR and a third down RB. He could possibly bring Reggie Bush ability to the running back position.
2007-05-24 10:35:35 · answer #11 · answered by bumblyjack 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋