2007-05-24 10:25:15 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
gooncnt, only if there's "No pufta's"
2007-05-24 10:37:39 · update #1
Yes, but only in the company of a bunch of philosophy professors named Bruce from the University of Wallamaloo.
Cheers, Pinhead...how could I forget the poofs?
2007-05-24 10:29:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to say since Hume liked his single malt scotch and Hegel was a beer guzzler. Kind of like apples and oranges, are we talking a matter of volume or potency? Wittgenstein was one of Heidegger's students and couldn't begin to keep up with hm. Nietsche was simply out of his gourd, and his sisters used to parade him around in a toga. He could be drunk without a drop.
2007-05-24 17:36:00 · answer #2 · answered by Fr. Al 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly but Wittgenstein was a beery swine, who was just as sloshed as Schlegel
2007-05-24 17:29:45 · answer #3 · answered by georgiansilver 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing Neitsche couldn't teach ya bout the raising of the wrist
Socrates himself was permanently pissed.
2007-05-24 17:33:51 · answer #4 · answered by Luc 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
But Rene Descartes was a drunken fart,
"I drink, therefore I am."
And Socrates himself is particularly missed...
2007-05-24 17:28:21 · answer #5 · answered by Scotty Doesnt Know 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean in a hot dog eating contest? I think Freud would win that one.
2007-05-24 17:29:41 · answer #6 · answered by micahcf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋