Iranian President Ahmadinejad has vowed to go forward with Uranium Project??

Question

He is ignoring Sanctions, and demands by the U N.. Sounds simular to Sadaam proir to this war.. I wonder with 70% against The war in Iraq.. Who will support an Iranian Invasion..

Threats to wipe us off the map are serious

I do not encourage invasion, trust me, I just see a familiar trend beginning to unfold

Answer 1

Support for an invasion (convenient as it would be with Iran surrounded on two sides), will likely be non-existant. A little bombing is the most we can hope for.

When terrorists set off a nuke in Washington DC, New York, or some other city that people outside the US have heard of (I feel relatively safe in obscurity where I live), it might make a difference - though probably not, the Iranians can just deny it was one of thier nukes (there are all those unaccounted for russian nukes, for instance, it could have been one of them, and North Korea is desperate for cash, maybe they sold a nuke...).

Answer 2

I won't support any preemptive invasion of any country that's not a direct threat to us or anyone else. President Ahmadinejad isn't insane enough to launch a nuclear strike against another country, even Israel. He is just posturing and showing that he won't be intimidated by the US or UN members. I don't agree with a lot of what he has to say, but I do respect him for standing his ground and refusing to be bullied by other "Superpowers".
Call me a liberal, commie, leftist, or whatever but I think it is commendable to have the courage and tenacity to risk defying the overwhelming might of the UN member nations. The man has balls, no doubt about it!

Answer 3

Actually the threats were against Israel. Our military is not all powerful and the idea of invading another country at this point is foolish. Leaving the coop to go fight the fox just leaves the coop unprotected for another fox. Seriously, the generals know better. We should listen to them as they have made a career in the fighting service. Not someone who skipped out on his guard duty.

Answer 4

as is Irans or any other signer of the NPT right. before you encourage invasion,shouldn't it be considered that the negative will outweigh the positive.

edit. they never threatened to wipe anyone of the map(been debunked)in fact in all the attacks against Israel since its creation,Iran has not been a party. As far as nukes,they are traceable

Answer 5

"language he had no longer used so explicitly considering the fact that October 2005 while he promised to wipe Israel "off the map" i'm no longer likely to talk or maybe entertain this question. I purely prefer to point out a actuality. The remark you talk of has been shown to be incorrect, it replaced right into a mistranslation, the relatively translation. in accordance to Juan Cole, a school of Michigan Professor of cutting-edge center East and South Asian history, Ahmadinejad's assertion could be translated as: The Imam pronounced that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) could desire to [vanish from] the internet site of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad).[12] Norouzi's translation is same.[eleven] in accordance to Cole, "Ahmadinejad did no longer say he replaced into going to 'wipe Israel off the map' as a results of fact no such idiom exists in Persian". somewhat, "He did say he was hoping its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, could give way end the conflict mongering and tutor your self, don't think the hype. And to characteristic to this, if he, like that's suggested pronounced this, why could he immediately flow on television while the remark replaced into introduced on television and say it replaced right into a mistranslation. I dint think of somebody could have this style of substitute of heart in much less then 24 hours. source; wikipedia and the internet, and self exploration of information

Answer 6

amhendinajud is a " freedom fighter"
and poses in no way a threat to anyone
even though he sits on all the energy he could possiby need
they only need nuclear for energy ok
he is a peaceful muzzlimm
muzzlimms are peacefulll you do know this correct ?

Answer 7

U.S. would definitely lose if they think about invading Iran, as in ground power, U.S. ground forces are depleted, only way would be by air, or just a nuke to remind everybody who's boss.

Answer 8

Why would you want to invade a country who wants nuclear POWER? We've got no proof that he wants it for other reasons (other than we don't like him and he doesn't like us).