2007-05-24 07:12:55 · 10 answers · asked by goring 6 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
No one can know for sure until we actually can go that fast, One of Einsteins theries was that if a man traveled past the speed o light he would go back in time.
But i dont think so.
2007-05-24 07:52:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, since he's travelling at 99%C and the Universe is not, the passage of time is only relative to him so, depending on how long he maintained that speed, he wouldn't age but for the time he spent travelling at 99%C and the Universe, with eveyone in it not travelling that speed at the same time, would be older (he wouldn't get younger).
2007-05-24 14:19:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, time would slow down for him so that thousands of years would pass on Earth while only a few would pass by for him. He wouldn't turn into a baby or disappear up his own existence.
2007-05-25 23:50:43 · answer #3 · answered by kwilfort 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, for them the time would pass normally, but when them coma back to the earth they are going to find out that everybody they knew are old now.
2007-05-24 17:10:52 · answer #4 · answered by Gearld GTX 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You need a constructive hobby. You apparently have far to much free time.
My suggestion: Take some time to learn proper spelling and English grammar and mechanics.
2007-05-24 14:16:43 · answer #5 · answered by Lady Geologist 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Time does NOT go backwards. From the standpoint of a stationary person, a person going
99% of lightspeed experiences slower time.
2007-05-24 14:16:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No time to him will seem the same but to us a huge period of time would have passed
2007-05-24 14:46:19 · answer #7 · answered by M Series 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No that would be going backwards. His clock would run normally. It's moving the same speed as he is.
2007-05-24 14:16:27 · answer #8 · answered by Gene 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's only a drunken theory, having a child's body but still having a big one.
2007-05-24 14:15:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no.
2007-05-24 14:19:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋