ric flair...(the nature-boy)
or
the undertaker?
2007-05-24 07:09:53 · 31 answers · asked by x.T.x 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
;-) star my question? =)
2007-05-24 07:10:17 · update #1
The Phenom!!!
The Deadman!!!
The Undead!!!
The Undefeted!!!
The Undertaker!!!
2007-05-24 07:20:09 · answer #1 · answered by Zpider 20-0 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Undertaker is so much better than Ric Flair. His career will be remembered for years and ages after he retire. Undertaker is in main event status while Ric Flair is being a jobber.
2007-05-24 14:31:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Undertaker is over-rated so Ric Flair wins.
2007-05-24 14:22:27 · answer #3 · answered by Rosalie C 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obviously im gunan say these are two of the top 10 greatest wrestlers of all time. As far as in ring skills are concerned, Taker has the advantage. On the mic, Flair is on top. Taker is also good on the mic, and Flair is good in the ring. I have to say the 16 time champion, the greatest of all time on this one. Look at the guts of flair, at the age of like 57 getting RKO'd off of a 14 foot high ladder face first onto the mat. He has gave it his all in every match he has faced. Thats why he is a legend. Dont get me wrong though, Taker has a lot of guts too, but its easy to look tough in a match when you are portrayed a a tough guy who can barely get hurt. Ric Flair is portrayed as a dirty player who is a coward when having to go face to face, and gets hurt easily. He won a Royal Rumble match, and he was the first one in!. Taken can win a Royal Rumble, but he doesnt have the stanima to go from 1-30.
winner: Flair
2007-05-24 14:19:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
For sure it's the Undertaker.OK he hasn't got as many titles but the Deadman has got the look, the gimmick, the in-ring smarts & the whole phenom.He can wrestle & brawl all night &still come back at you.He's been in my all-timefave match - the Hell in a Cell match in 1997 v Mankind.That's the one where Foley got choke-slammed off the top of the cage thru the table.Awesome!
Flair is talented for sure but Taker is the brawler & the fighter& that will always come out better than just talent.
2007-05-24 22:00:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ric Flair is all right, but the Undertaker is very mysterious and evil.
2007-05-24 14:13:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the undertaker because ric flair is hardly a boy or into nature.
2007-05-24 14:17:29 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hmm.. Though one, I don't really like any of them much.
Ric Flair is the better technical wrestler of them.
Doesn't mean Undertaker isn't good too though.
Both of them have quite a thing for getting the audience to react to whatever they are doing.
2007-05-24 14:14:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ric Flair, Fans always participate in his matches with the Wooos
Undertaker's matches are boring as hell
2007-05-24 14:20:09 · answer #9 · answered by Fred O 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The undertaker will be remebered longer then ric flair ever will be.
2007-05-24 14:15:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋