2007-05-24 06:50:43 · 18 answers · asked by Love Hillary 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
All the people complaining about the war should go over to Iraq and do something. Volunteer instead of ranting behind a computer. It is hypocritical to say the least to rant and be cozy behind the safety of one’s computer. If people feel so strongly about the war, they should go to the military and be ready to help the troops.
2007-05-24 06:56:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm trying to figure out the purpose of this question. Are you asking this backwards to see just how many conservatives will agree with you as though it is true? You already know it's the opposite, and no, the majority of this country will not stop "complaining" until they see huge changes in Bush's failed Iraq policy.
2007-05-24 07:05:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Vietnam replaced into additionally an exceedingly unpopular conflict, and, after Nixon replaced into elected on obscure can provide to end it ("Peace with Honor," 'Vietnamizing the conflict'), it took 4 years to get (very just about) thoroughly out. 2 years later, Saigon replaced into falling. while the subsequent President takes workplace in 2009, she (or he) isn't likely to do a good purchase greater powerful.
2016-12-18 03:25:46 · answer #3 · answered by declue 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you have it backwards. 70% of Americans are opposed to the war. And we should complain until the remaining 30% get the message.
2007-05-24 06:57:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is more like whining than complaining.
It has been quiet in Lebanon and Palestine lately. Who should be blamed for that?
North Korea has not been playing with their nuclear toys lately. Who get the blame for that?
We could pass a little blame to the U.N. and Europe for Somalia. Or should we send an army in?
The U.S. keeps getting Latin American countries out of financial hot water. Who do we blame for that?
We have Senators calling for a trade war with China. Who should we blame for avoiding that?
We have "leaders" that practice avoiding any action on their watch to avoid any blame.
Do we have an "attention deficit" that prohibits completing difficult objectives if there is tough going in the middle?
Singling out specific problems is so easy any journalist can do it. Putting things into a global perspective gets a little more difficult.
Jimmy Carter may have said that Bush is our worst POTUS. He certainly would be an expert. Compare 1979 with 2007 (global conflicts, economics, social equality). We always have choices.
2007-05-24 07:24:40 · answer #5 · answered by Menehune 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Get some sleep your going dyslexic.
That's 70% disapprove and 10% approve 20% undecided.
Go Team Bush Go
2007-05-24 07:07:02 · answer #6 · answered by ShortBus43 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are pretty far off. Check out:
http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm
from Fox News. That's the most conservative numbers I've seen to support your misinformation.
2007-05-24 07:18:05 · answer #7 · answered by genmalia 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I dont think its 70% for the war. it is 70% that knows we cant just tuck tail and get out that way..
2007-05-24 06:54:50 · answer #8 · answered by Antiliber 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
HILLAY IS A MARXIST WARMONGER
THE PEOPLE DON'T WANT THE WAR OR NORTH AMERICAN UNION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RON PAUL 2008
GET INFORMED AT INFOWARS HTE JIG IS UP FOR BIG GOV'T AND THE PRIVATELY OWNED FOR PROFIT FEDERAL RESERVE!!!
THERE WILL BE NO NEW WORLD ORDER!!
2007-05-24 12:26:40 · answer #9 · answered by guiseppeamore 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mind if I ask where the hell you got that statistic?
Every single one I've heard recently says the exact opposite.
2007-05-24 06:56:03 · answer #10 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋