English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or do you just want a reason to be upset? CLEARLY the troops have no power in this. How would it be possible for THEM to be the terrorists? They are just doing their jobs.

If you are an Iraqi and you are being attacked by a nation, I am sorry, but to THEM that would make US the terrorists. It's an ugly truth.

Terrorist: a person who terrorizes or frightens others.

2007-05-24 06:20:31 · 13 answers · asked by DeAnna 4 in News & Events Current Events

13 answers

UNFORTUNATELY OUR TROOPS DON'T HAVE A SAY ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. THEY ARE THERE FOLLOWING ORDERS. AND IN ALL HONESTY I DON'T BELIEVE SHE CALLED OUR TROOPS TERRORISTS, BUT SHE IS SAYING THAT WAR HAS TWO SIDES. NO ONE WANTS TO THINK OF THE ONES WE ARE INVADING AS PEOPLE, JUST ENEMIES, AND ITS SIMPLY JUST NOT LIKE THAT. MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WILL LOSE THEIR LIVES OFF THIS AND ITS JUST NOT FAIR ON EITHER SIDE FOR THE INNOCENT TO DIE, BUT ITS THE REALITY OF WAR.
I THINK ROSIE IS TIRED OF THE WORD TERRORIST. ELIZABETH IS REALLY INTO USING THAT WORD AND THAT SOME HOW JUSTIFIES WHY SHE IS SO SUPPORTIVE OF BUSH.
WHAT ROSIE WAS SAYING THAT ANYONE CAN BE A TERRORIST AND WE CAN'T LOSE SITE OF WHAT THIS WAR WAS SUPPOSE TO BE ABOUT. AND IT CLEARLY HAS. SO SHE IS SAYING THAT ITS TIME TO PULL THE TROOPS OUT SO THAT THINGS CAN BE REEXAMINED.
BUT NO MATTER WHAT SHE IS SUPPORT OF THE TROOPS AND CARES OF THEIR SAFETY AND WELL BEING BOTH HOME AND AWAY AND WHEN THEY RETURN. AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ALL SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT.

2007-05-24 09:41:48 · answer #1 · answered by 3whiskerbiscuits 4 · 0 0

Just think about this. American troops are responsible for the freedom many places on the earth enjoy. If it was not for American trouble by now Hitler and his successors would of had killed off the Jews completely, France would be speaking German and Asian would have rivers flowing with human blood even in this day. Rosie knows this so why should she belittle the troops? This is even if she is against the Iraqi conflict in specific and war/killing in general. Even the Iraqi conflict opposers know this, so do you think they will disrespect the troops? What I think she meant is that a lot of civilian lives has been lost since American invaded for political reasons. So the pain we expressed on 9/11 is happening to them in a way too. She is not implying that American troops are ruthless killers. People, you have brains... try to use them once in a while to see the deeper meaning behind words!

2016-05-17 04:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by theo 3 · 0 0

Rosie O' Donnell, on more than one occasion, and without saying the actual words. "the real terrorists in Iraq are our troops.", has without a doubt, implied the same.

Where Elisabeth erred yesterday was in not answering "YES" to Rosie's direct question, "do YOU Elisabeth believe that I called our troops "terrorists"?....
I wanted to shout out, "Say YES Elisabeth, just say the words "YES ROSIE" I believe you called our troops terrorists!"
the answer has been very clear since the beginnings of Rosie's rants and her spewing, along with her cohort Joy Behar, of her twisted, fanatical liberal, left-wing venom aimed at the Bush administration.

And here you are, DeAnna, joining her in the same chorus calling the United States "the terrorists". WOW...where are you people coming from? And to say the U.S. has "attacked" Iraq shows more twisted logic...didn't we save the Iraqi's from further repression, annihilation, murder and the torture of innocent women and children and other crimes against humanity caused by the madman Saddam Hussein?
just who was the terrorist when a mother had to watch her child being killed right in front of her, or her husband executed for simply disagreeing with something Saddam said?

The sooner Rosie is gone from the scene the better, not only for Elisabeth Hasselbeck but, for all of America who has had to listen to daily trashing of the Bush Administration.

One more point to be made here...and a reminder...
In the fall of 2000, Bill Clinton while being "serviced" by Monica Lewinsky, failed to identify the ominous and looming threat of Osama Bin Laden and had 8-10 chances to kill Bin Laden in Afghanistan, and failed to take the CIA's advice to do it...
less than a year later...9/11.
And who does Rosie blame for 9/11? George W. Bush.
(even claiming that Bush "intentionally" set charges to the WTC building #7 in order to bring it down, making Bush responsible for the destruction at the WTC).
need I say more?

2007-05-24 08:24:29 · answer #3 · answered by GeneL 7 · 1 0

We had no business going there and doing what we did. Yes, Saddam was wrong and deserved to be taken down, but that was NONE OF OUR BUSINESS!!!!!!!!!

Why don't we worry about all the messed up @#$% going on in our own country? Why don't we feed the hungry? Or how about this, FREE HEALTH CARE!!!!!! But no, we spend MILLIONS and MILLIONS on some bull**** war that has nothing to even do with what our precious president says it does... Everyone can blame Clinton for this all they want, but our country was in better shape while Clinton was getting blown than it is now!

2007-05-24 11:20:27 · answer #4 · answered by ~*Kristen*~ 2 · 0 0

Doe's anyone really have any respect for Rosie O'Donnell?
If you all would stop watching her shows maybe Hollywood would do us all a favor and cancel her contracts. It just goes to show the level of Americans intellect by how many people actually watch her garbage and other shows like hers. She has no class, do yourself a favor and stop watching her show.

2007-05-24 06:33:41 · answer #5 · answered by Dan 3 · 1 0

You just answered your own question that yes indeed Rosie was calling our troops terrorists. Very stupid thing to say indeed.

2007-05-24 06:25:17 · answer #6 · answered by BravesWings 4 · 1 0

Rosie o' Donnell is a totally useless trollop who does not deserve the attention given to her. She should crawl back under whichever rock she crawled out from

2007-05-24 06:24:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Wow you make a really interesting point there.

2007-05-24 06:23:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

YES, she probably not proud of saying it but yep

2007-05-24 06:27:38 · answer #9 · answered by MACK 3 · 1 0

I have always only heard her support the troops.

she doesn't blame them at all, she puts the blame squarely where it belongs.

2007-05-24 06:24:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers