want to wait another 16 years to do something about it?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070524/wl_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_3;_ylt=AgcoSHcJl3RUwPrLgFQW3d8E1vAI
2007-05-24 05:22:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Steve, they all did vote for the war in Iraq! lol! except for one.
2007-05-24 05:30:08 · update #1
What are you willing to negotiate for? The article says they have ignored all attempts at negotiating.
2007-05-24 05:32:20 · update #2
yeah, jon, get down there and lend a hand why don't you?
2007-05-24 05:33:43 · update #3
No, JGF, it is for your benefit I used it. I would never trust the UN again.
2007-05-24 05:35:41 · update #4
Don't be silly queen, if the shaw was still there we wouldn't have a problem with Iran.
2007-05-24 05:37:37 · update #5
Can you trust the UN to protect you? The New World Order, with bill clitoon at the helm, what a scary thought.
Iran is going to have to be dealt with. The US is doing the right thing, until the traitors at ABC spilled the facts to the enemy.
Iran is having a revolution today. you will not hear about if from the MSM, they are opposed to it, but the Iranians want our freedoms, our form of government, and they are revolting today, right now, they are fighting for their freedoms.
They do not want our troops, they want our help however, they need money, and our government has been helping. Now the ABC traitors,,,,,,,,,,,
I am saddened that this is going to hurt them, that many will die because of ABC.
2007-05-25 14:05:33 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tinker we need our PRESS to stop being the terrorist 5th column. They need to challenge the Middle East to get their act together & create wealth the way their brethren have that moved to the 1st world.
Granted this would mean that the PRESS would have to acknowledge that they are really leaders & not just reporters. I'll acknowledge that they are both & that they should be accountable to some predefined limit. If a non-press person insights a riot they can be charged with a crime. Doesn't the words & the stories the press chooses to high light attempt to call people to action?
The Democrats also need to start acknowledging what they want to see in a realistic world. Utopias are fine to theorize about, but by definition it is a fantasy.
Both the USSR & the US knew that nuclear weapon could never be used. During the cold war both sides created newer & better ones. It wasn't necessarily with the intent to use them. They both knew they couldn't. It was a scientific study under the disguise of defense.
The IRANIAN leader is different he brags that he will use them. This is just the opposite of the leaders of the USSR & the US. Their leaders agonized that some day a nut would push the button. Anyone foolish enough to glorify using a nuclear weapon should never be allowed near one. At the same time the M.A.D. deterrant reasoning has its place in defense.
2007-05-25 20:29:40 · answer #2 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whoo hoo, next stop Iran- on the US Democracy Express Train. Throw some more soldiers into the line of fire.
BTW, didn't Bush say he was the "Decider" and he will determine who we wage war against next.. The Dems don't factor into this-yet
If you mean dems waiting- do you mean the way the US "waited" (sarcasm) in the 50's, messed with Iran and propped up the Shah who destroyed the country so badly, the pendulum swung to the extreme right so we now have to deal with the run amok theocracy we have now? did you ever stop to think about how the chickens have come home to roost because a Republican President, good old Ike, in 1952 determined that we should mess with Iran? Maybe if we hadn't messed with it then, we would not be having to deal with this crap now. They would have kept and grown the democracy they had had in place BEFORE we interfered and the possibility existed that there would be no edicts issued by a Grand Ayatollah. There would be no suppression of freedoms.
"Those who do not learn from their mistakes will be condemned to repeat them"
2007-05-24 12:35:03 · answer #3 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The United Nations and International Atomic Energy Agency are big jokes and no longer carry with their titles any effective authority. When an emergency arises do you see the UN taking any serious actions to remedy the emergency? No. They are simply a bunch of bureaucratic oafs who are full of it and no longer serve their original purposes. The UN requires a complete overhaul.
2007-05-24 12:34:13 · answer #4 · answered by You Ask & I Answer!!! 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The USA and Israel should just make glass farmers out of the Iranians and be done with the Nazislamic Fascist scum now
Not later
2007-05-24 12:36:58 · answer #5 · answered by BUILD THE WALL 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They'll try and talk Iran's madman dictator into being a passive, twisted peacenik who cares more for whales and grass like themselves. When that fails, which it will they'll blame Bush.
2007-05-25 17:08:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wee hoo, next stop Iran. It is so super cool to police the whole world try to force our way of life on them.
P.S. How are those Katrina victims doing, think we should maybe clean up our own mess first?
2007-05-24 12:27:16 · answer #7 · answered by Jon H 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The IAEA says it will be another three to eight years before Iran has a nuclear weapon. We obviously have negotiating time.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070524/ap_on_re_eu/nuclear_agency_iran
2007-05-24 12:26:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
LET'S GET THIS PROBLEM OUT OF THE WAY ASAP. IF
JIMMY CARTER DIDN'T SELL THE SHAH DOWN THE RIVER WE WON'T HAVE THIS PROBLEM TODAY.
2007-05-24 13:29:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When did the Democrats get to decide about military intervention? I thought Bush was the "decider"
2007-05-24 12:26:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋