The two term limit is in place for a reason... Even if I supported EVERY decision Bush has ever made, I still believe that it is time for some fresh blood.
2007-05-24 02:16:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by HSK's mama 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, two terms is enough. Anyway, it surely would take more than a bill passed by congress to get rid of the two term limit since it is part of the Constitution, the 22nd amendment.
2007-05-24 02:50:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mike W 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
One, that regulation could desire to on no account be handed. Congress will possibly on no account enable it ensue. yet, only for the sake of arguement, enable's say it did bypass. who's his working campanion? who's working against him? i'm registered as self sustaining, yet have voted Republican for the final couple of elections through fact the Democratic occasion would not placed every person solid up. are you able to think of Al Gore having to handle 9/11?
2016-10-13 07:52:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by baskette 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope.
We don't need a 3 term president ever again.
Once was enough.
2007-05-24 02:20:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hey, that sounds like a swell idea!!!! And we could get rid of the national debt easily....just cut all welfare funding and give them the jobs the illegal aliens are coming here to do!!!!!!
2007-05-24 02:19:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope--America needs a change..............and that means let's end the Clinton/Bush dynasty.
2007-05-24 02:22:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would, but its not going to happen. Stop beating the horse... its dead now.
2007-05-24 02:12:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by MotherBear1975 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not if this amnesty bill passes.
2007-05-24 02:18:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you sir sound like one of those terrorist
2007-05-24 02:22:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋